|Wireless News Aggregation|
|Friday — December 11, 2015 — Issue No. 687|
Dear Friends of Wireless Messaging,
Welcome back to The Wireless Messaging News.
Medical Residents Embrace Texting, Putting Patient Info at Risk
Despite security concerns, the vast majority of medical residents prefer short message service (SMS) text messaging compared with other forms of in-hospital communication, according to a recent survey conducted at the University of Chicago as well as Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn, Ill.
In the survey, about 130 internal medicine residents were given several possible communication options: telephone, email, hospital paging, and SMS text messaging. Survey results, published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, show that SMS text messaging was the preferred mode of in-hospital communication by 71.7 percent of respondents due to its efficiency and by 79.8 percent because of its ease of use.
Using SMS text messages, 70.9 percent of surveyed respondents reported having received patient identifiers (first and/or last name), 81.7 percent received patient initials, and 50.4 percent received a patient’s medical record number. Yet, when it came to security, 82.5 percent of those residents surveyed said they preferred the hospital paging system, while only 20.6 percent of respondents preferred SMS text messaging for secure communication.
“People were much more willing to use text messaging because of it was efficient, but when asked about security their preference was the hospital paging system, which is kind of interesting because the paging system is not HIPAA-compliant,” says Micah Prochaska, M.D., a hospitalist scholar and post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Chicago.
Prochaska opines that because paging systems have been historically used by hospitals and are institutionally-supported, residents have the perception that pagers are more secure for communicating about patients. At the same time, while SMS text messaging is an efficient form of communication and pervasive in healthcare, researchers who conducted the survey warn that it may not securely protect patient information.
“For providers, it is possible that the benefits of improved in-hospital communication with SMS text messaging and the presumed improvement in the coordination and delivery of patient care outweigh security concerns they may have,” researchers conclude. “The tension between the security and convenience of SMS text messaging may represent an educational opportunity to ensure the compliance of mobile technology in the healthcare setting.”
Source: Health Data Management
New FAA Antenna Marking and Lighting Requirements
“On December 4, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) released Advisory Circular for Obstruction Marking and Lighting 70/7460-1L (AC 70/7460-1L), which cancels and replaces Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K.1 This release effectively amends the lighting requirements applicable to towers that must be registered in the Commission’s Antenna Structure Registration (ASR) system.”
Read the FCC's DA 15-1391 Public Notice here.
Now more news and views.
Wayne County, Illinois
A new issue of the Wireless Messaging Newsletter is posted on the web each week. A notification goes out by e-mail to subscribers on most Fridays around noon central US time. The notification message has a link to the actual newsletter on the web. That way it doesn’t fill up your incoming e-mail account.
There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. Readers are a very select group of wireless industry professionals, and include the senior managers of many of the world’s major Paging and Wireless Messaging companies. There is an even mix of operations managers, marketing people, and engineers — so I try to include items of interest to all three groups. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.
I regularly get readers’ comments, so this newsletter has become a community forum for the Paging, and Wireless Messaging communities. You are welcome to contribute your ideas and opinions. Unless otherwise requested, all correspondence addressed to me is subject to publication in the newsletter and on my web site. I am very careful to protect the anonymity of those who request it.
I spend the whole week searching the Internet for news that I think may be of interest to you — so you won’t have to. This newsletter is an aggregator — a service that aggregates news from other news sources. You can help our community by sharing any interesting news that you find.
Editorial Opinion pieces present only the opinions of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any of advertisers or supporters. This newsletter is independent of any trade association.
Back To Paging
* required field
If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter just fill in the blanks in the form above, and then click on the “Subscribe” button.
There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.
Can You Help The Newsletter?
You can help support The Wireless Messaging News by clicking on the PayPal Donate button above. It is not necessary to be a member of PayPal to use this service.
Newspapers generally cost
A donation of $50.00 would certainly help cover a one-year period. If you are wiling and able, please click on the PayPal Donate button above.
If you are reading this, your potential customers are reading it as well. Please click here to find out about our advertising options.
NEW COMPUTER FOR THE NEWSLETTER
It's Time To Help
The Wireless Messaging News
The Board of Advisor members are people with whom I have developed a special rapport, and have met personally. They are not obligated to support the newsletter in any way, except with advice, and maybe an occasional letter to the editor.
|RF Demand Solutions|
BlackBerry Priv already sold out at Walmart, shares soar
Himanshu, 11 December, 2015
The world's largest retailer Walmart started selling BlackBerry's Priv a couple of days ago, and a quick look at the retailer's website now reveals that the device is already out of stock. Its listed price on Walmart is $700.
A quick bit of Googling reveals that the Android-powered smartphone went out of stock at Walmart in less than a day.
Assuming that there wasn't an issue on Walmart's end and the retailer wasn't selling only a handful of units, this indicates a very high demand for the Priv, something which can attributed to the hype around the device as well the ongoing holiday season.
As a result the Canadian company's share price has been climbing rapidly this week (11% up to $8.15) reaching its highest level this year.
While these are no doubt silver linings for BlackBerry, it would be premature to say that the device has done the trick for the struggling Canadian company as official sales figures aren't yet in.
|Falcon Wireless Direct|
AN INVITATION TO JOIN OUR TEAM!
|Voluntary Newsletter Supporters By Donation|
Premium Newsletter Supporter
Premium Newsletter Supporter
Canyon Ridge Communications
Premium Newsletter Supporter
e*Message Wireless Information Services Europe
Incyte Capital Holdings LLC
Apple iPhone 7, 7 Plus Rumors: Specifications, Features, Release Date Details Surface
BY ANVINRAJ SIVANANDAN ON 12/11/15 AT 2:43 AM
The iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus are the smartphones from Apple that are rumored to arrive next year. However, the rumors of both the devices started swirling even before the release of iPhone 6S and 6S Plus handsets.
Design and Display
According to Phone Arena, the exterior appeal of the iPhone 7 ad 7 Plus will not be entirely different from iPhone 6S and 6S Plus handsets. Both the handsets may continue to sport series 7000 aluminum build.
Rumors are rife that the next generation iPhones won’t feature a physical Home button. Hence, both the iPhones will have the fingerprint scanner embedded inside their display. Speculations also suggest that iPhone 7 models won’t feature a 3.5 mm audio jack. Hence, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus handsets will be the slimmest iPhones ever.
The iPhone 7 is likely to feature a 4.7-inch display with a screen resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels. The iPhone 7 Plus is expected to feature a 5.5-inch full HD display. The 3D Touch feature that arrived with iPhone 6S and 6S Plus will be also available on the iPhone 7 and 7S Plus handsets.
Chipset, RAM and Camera
The next generation iPhone 7 handsets are rumored to be powered by Apple A10 chipset that will feature a 64-bit processor built by TSMC with 16nm FinFET technology. Like the iPhone 6S and 6S Plus models, the successor models could continue to support 2 GB of RAM.
Since Apple upgraded the rear camera to 12-megapixel and front camera to 5-megapixel on iPhone 6 and 6S Plus this year, the successor models are expected to sport the same set of cameras. However, it is likely to arrive with newer functionalities and enhancements.
iPhone 7 and 7 Plus Release Date
Apple follows a pattern of releasing new iPhones in the month of September. The iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus are expected to release within the first two weeks of September.
|Product Support Services, Inc.|
Repair and Refurbishment Services
Product Support Services, Inc.
PSSI is the industry leader in reverse logistics, our services include depot repair, product returns management, RMA and RTV management, product audit, test, refurbishment, re-kitting and value recovery.
ADVERTISE YOUR BUSINESS HERE
Now stocking the full line of Daviscomms paging products
SPS-5v9E Paging System
DMG Protocol Converter
A Shatterproof smartphone from Motorola?
|Source:||KDVR Fox 31 Denver|
Alert Standard Creator Shares FCC Comments on Wireless Emergency Alerts
With the deadline approaching for giving the FCC suggestions about improving Wireless Emergency Alerts, the original creator/promoter of the Common Alerting Protocol offers comments on a wide variety of WEA issues.
The deadline is fast approaching to comment on possible changes to rules governing Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA). It’s an excellent opportunity to influence changes in an important alerting channel. Art Botterell, the original architect and proponent of the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) that made WEA and other alerting enhancements possible, was kind enough to give us a sneak peek at the comments he’ll submit. We summarize them here because they astutely cover major WEA issues such as geo-targeting, rich media via WEA, two-way information, multiple languages, training, and less-than-emergency alerts.
Geo-targeting: Botterell says, “At a stroke, we remove many of the complexities and costs of limiting transmission precisely by selecting cell sites or sectors” by providing the boundaries of an alert via CAP so capabilities in mobile devices that identify their location could be tapped. Botterell says creation of CAP anticipated a time when location-aware devices would be common. As it stands, location targeting of WEA messages is controlled by reach of cell tower signals.
Rich Media: Botterell says the standards allow more information such as “binary” rich data to be transmitted via CAP, but creators realized not all alert dissemination channels could accommodate the payload. He suggests that consideration be given to transmitting digital information, such as a picture of the missing child, one time via WEA.
Multiple Languages: Botterell says CAP supports “full internationalization” of messages. However, he’s concerned that regulations might require alert originators to send messages in multiple languages. He warns that if forced to generate multilingual alerts, originators might rely on pre-scripted alerts that are inflexible and insufficiently specific.
Alert Simplicity: Any additions to the complexity of WEA alert authoring, or any heightening of originator’s fears about getting alerts right, is undesirable. The inhibiting force of of “alerting anxiety” among responsible alert originators should not be underestimated.
Another Category: WEA messages are now restricted to Imminent Threats, Amber Alerts, and Presidential Emergency Messages. There’s been talk about adding another category, “Emergency Government Information.” Botterell doesn’t think another category is necessary, saying the Imminent Threat category gives public safety practitioners sufficient flexibility. He says, “A misunderstanding seems to have arisen in some quarters that the ‘Imminent Threat’ category is not available to local emergency managers or public safety officers. This perhaps indicates a shortfall in user education.” Botterell notes that information such as boil water advisories and shelter location information would be appropriate Imminent Threat messages, as long as an emergency situation was underway.
Alert Training: Botterell likes giving mobile device owners the option of receiving test alerts. That way, he says, it’s more practical to give alert originators hands-on experience in activating alerts.
Recipient Feedback: Botterell is not bullish on suggestions that alerts solicit recipient feedback or confirmation. First, he says, there’s no evidence that people are more likely to take action in response to an alert if they confirm delivery. And, he says, “Neither is it clear what usable information could be extracted from a massive stream of acknowledgment messages, nor what expectations the provision of an individual response mechanism might raise in members of the public.” He notes that the law that created WEA did not suggest that WEA “was ever intended to impinge on the role of next-generation 911.”
We realize the deadline is fast approaching. Responding is not time-consuming. Please speak up!
Wireless Communication Solutions
USB Paging Encoder
Paging Data Receiver (PDR)
Please see our web site for other products including Internet Messaging Gateways, Unified Messaging Servers, test equipment, and Paging Terminals.
SEE WEB FOR COMPLETE LIST:
Selected portions of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update, and/or the BloostonLaw Private Users Update — newsletters from the Law Offices of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP — are reproduced in this section with the firm’s permission.
Court of Appeals Hears Net Neutrality Arguments
On December 4, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard oral arguments on the FCC’s latest Open Internet Order. The debate covered the primary arguments proffered by both sides, with the industry firms arguing that broadband companies should not be subjected to monopoly-era telephone company regulations, and that the FCC abused its authority in imposing Title II regulations (particularly when it extended regulation to mobile Internet, which is not part of the public switched network).
Topics that provoked probing questions from the judges included the FCC’s decision to move away from its original “light touch approach” intentions (public demand, said FCC attorney Jon Sallet) and whether mobile and fixed Internet should be regulated differently ("So if I’m walking in my house with an iPad — at one end of the hall I connect to my Wi-Fi, at the other end, my device switches over to my wireless subscription — did Congress really intend these two services to be regulated totally differently even if I can’t tell the difference?" said Judge Srinivasan).
According to the Washington Post, “Dozens of court-watchers began lining up before dawn to hear the case, with some having spent the night in frigid temperatures outside the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.” For the more patient, audio recordings of the oral argument session can be found here, under 12/04/2015.
Opinions differ on which way the judges will decide the case, but most predict it will get appealed up to the Supreme Court either way.
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Releases Impairment File Formats for Forward Auction
The FCC Wireless Bureau has released specifications for impairment file formats for the broadcast incentive auction. The Commission previously determined that qualified bidders in the forward auction of 600 MHz licenses (Auction 1002) will have access to detailed impairment information upon receipt of their registration materials. The specifications (available HERE) set forth the file formats in which this information will be made available to qualified bidders, and enable prospective forward auction bidders to begin familiarizing themselves with the auction process.
As prospective bidders in the Incentive Auction should be aware, the incentive auction process will involve “repacking” of the remaining broadcast TV operations in a smaller portion of the TV band, and this repacking may result in a limited number of full power and Class A television stations to be assigned to the 600 MHz band. This creates the potential for inter-service interference (or “ISIX”) in markets where broadcast TV stations and wireless services will be operating in close geographic proximity on the same and/or adjacent frequencies. Because new 600 MHz wireless operators have an obligation to protect broadcast TV receivers from ISIX, 600 MHz licenses in certain markets, and under certain repacking scenarios, will be subject to “impairments.” In this regard, the FCC’s ISIX rules (1) prohibit a 600 MHz wireless licensee from operating base stations within the contour of a co-channel or adjacent-channel full power and Class A television station, (2) require the 600 MHz wireless licensee to use OET-74 to predict interference to television receivers within such a station’s contour prior to deploying base stations within a specified culling distance of the station’s contour, and (3) prohibit operating base stations within that distance if harmful interference is predicted.
The impairment data will be released by the Commission prior to forward auction bidding and will allow bidders to identify licenses that have impairments, to view their impairment data in a map that can be viewed using a Tableau Reader (free to download on the Tableau website) and to choose between frequency-specific license blocks in the “Assignment Phase” of the forward auction.
The specifications provided by the FCC include, for each data file, an overall description of the file, the data fields that are included (with definitions of the data elements in each field), the data type, and notes or examples. Sample data is provided at the end of each file. We note that the specifications released by the FCC include sample data only; they do not reflect the actual impairment information that will be made available to qualified bidders during the auction.
TelePacific Files Petition for Reconsideration of Copper Retirement Report and Order
On December 4, the FCC issued a Public Notice announcing that U.S. TelePacific filed a Petition for Clarification on November 18, 2015, of the Report and Order on copper retirement “to resolve an apparent unintended consequence” of the reform process. Specifically, TelePacific seeks clarification circumstances where the ILEC retires copper but does not discontinue TDM services in the relevant community.
According to TelePacific, where a CLEC provides broadband service via Ethernet over Copper and the ILEC announces the retirement of those copper loops or feeder, it is possible that even while the CLEC is working to complete its Section 214 discontinuance and transition customers to alternative service providers, the CLEC could be forced to discontinue retail broadband service before Commission approval if the ILEC retires its copper.
Although TelePacific styled its filing as a Petition for Clarification, the FCC determined that the petition is more properly treated as a Petition for Reconsideration. As such, oppositions to the Petition will be due 15 days after publication of the notice on the Federal Register, and replies will be due 10 days after that.
Law & Regulation
Comment Deadline Extended for Protected Contours of Grandfathered 3.65GHz Licensees
On December 9, the FCC’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau issued a Public Notice extending the deadline for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Public Notice released on October 23 regarding an appropriate method for determining the protected contours for grandfathered 3650-3700 MHz band licensees. Comments are now due December 28, and reply comments are now due January 12.
The Bureau’s Public Notice seeks comment on a two-pronged approach to defining Grandfathered Wireless Protection Zones around “grandfathered” base stations. Under this two-part approach, the Grandfathered Wireless Protection Zone around each base station would be defined by: (1) sectors with a 4.4 km radius from each registered base station, and the azimuth and beamwidth registered for that base station with associated unregistered customer premises equipment (CPE) to encompass the operational area of unregistered subscriber stations; and (2) sectors (centered on each base station with the registered azimuth and beamwidth) which would encompass all registered subscriber stations within that sector.
The Public Notice also seeks comment on other issues related to the establishment of the Grandfathered Wireless Protection Zone, including: (1) procedures for determining compliance with the Commission’s construction and operation requirements for the band; and (2) an implementation strategy to ensure that an accurate definition of the Grandfathered Wireless Protection Zone is available to the authorized Spectrum Access Systems (SASs).
Existing networks in the 3650-3700 MHz band in the majority of cases are constructed to provide last mile wireless broadband access. Generally, a base station is constructed in the center of the area intended to be served and then as subscribers are enrolled, CPE is put in place at various points around the base station. CPE that operates below the mobile power limit of 1 watt/25 MHz EIRP does not have to be registered in ULS, while all equipment that operates above that limit must be registered.
Our law firm’s clients with registered 3650-3700 MHz band operations should let us know if they want us to provide them with a more detailed report on the Commission’s proposals.
Revisions to Form 498 Implemented
Last week, USAC announced that a revised version of the FCC Form 498 had been deployed in its E-File system, and highlighted some of the revisions that might lead to confusion. Particularly, the term “Service Provider Identification Number,” or “SPIN” for short, has changed to "498 ID." According to the announcement, this change allows Schools and Libraries Program applicants to receive reimbursement directly from USAC rather than through their service provider. The only section of the form that has changed for service providers is Block 12, the Schools and Libraries Program section. In this block, there is no longer an option for service providers to select an alternative bank account for BEAR payments, as applicants will receive them directly.
NECA Releases Latest RLEC Report
NECA has released the latest edition of Trends, its report on the state of telecom technology deployment among its Traffic Sensitive (TS) Pool members. According to the report, TS Pool members have made steady progress over the past year, including:
A copy of the full report can be found here: https://www.neca.org/Trends_Report.aspx.
JANUARY 15: HAC REPORTING DEADLINE. The next Hearing Aid Compatible (HAC) reporting deadline for digital commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers (including carriers that provide service using AWS-1 spectrum and resellers of cellular, broadband PCS and/or AWS services) is Friday, January 15, 2016. Non-Tier I service providers must offer to consumers at least 50 percent of the handset models per air interface, or a minimum of ten handset models per air interface, that meet or exceed the M3 rating, and at least one-third of the handset models per air interface, or a minimum of ten handset models per air interface, that meet or exceed the T3 rating. Month-to-month handset offering information provided in annual reports must be current through the end of 2015. With many of our clients adjusting their handset offerings and making new devices available to customers throughout the year, it is very easy for even the most diligent carriers to stumble unknowingly into a non-compliance situation, resulting in fines starting at $15,000 for each HAC-enabled handset they are deficient. Following the T-Mobile USA Notice of Apparent Liability (FCC 12-39), the Commission’s enforcement policy calls for multiplying the $15,000 per-handset fine by the number of months of the deficiency, creating the potential for very steep fines. It is therefore crucial that our clients pay close attention to their HAC regulatory compliance, and monthly checks are strongly recommended. In this regard, we have prepared a HAC reporting template to assist our clients in keeping track of their HAC handset offerings, and other regulatory compliance efforts. ALL SERVICE PROVIDERS SUBJECT TO THE COMMISSION’S HAC RULES — INCLUDING COMPANIES THAT QUALIFY FOR THE DE MINIMIS EXCEPTION — MUST PARTICIPATE IN ANNUAL HAC REPORTING. To the extent that your company is a provider of broadband PCS, cellular and/or interconnected SMR services, if you are a CMRS reseller and/or if you have plans to provide CMRS using newly licensed (or partitioned) AWS or 700 MHz spectrum, you and your company will need to be familiar with the Commission’s revised rules.
FEBRUARY 1: FCC FORM 499-Q, TELECOMMUNICATIONS REPORTING WORKSHEET. All telecommunications common carriers that expect to contribute more than $10,000 to federal Universal Service Fund (USF) support mechanisms must file this quarterly form. The FCC has modified this form in light of its decision to establish interim measures for USF contribution assessments. The form contains revenue information from the prior quarter plus projections for the next quarter. Form 499-Q relates only to USF contributions. It does not relate to the cost recovery mechanisms for the Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Fund, the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA), and the shared costs of local number portability (LNP), which are covered in the annual Form 499-A that is due April 1.
FEBRUARY 1: FCC FORM 502, NUMBER UTILIZATION AND FORECAST REPORT. Any wireless or wireline carrier (including paging companies) that have received number blocks—including 100, 1,000, or 10,000 number blocks—from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), a Pooling Administrator, or from another carrier, must file Form 502 by February 1. Carriers porting numbers for the purpose of transferring an established customer’s service to another service provider must also report, but the carrier receiving numbers through porting does not. Resold services should also be treated like ported numbers, meaning the carrier transferring the resold service to another carrier is required to report those numbers but the carrier receiving such numbers should not report them. Reporting carriers are required to include their FCC Registration Number (FRN). Reporting carriers file utilization and forecast reports semiannually on or before February 1 for the preceding six-month reporting period ending December 31, and on or before August 1 for the preceding six-month reporting period ending June 30.
|This newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice. Those interested in more information should contact the firm. For additional information, please contact Hal Mordkofsky at 202-828-5520 or email@example.com .|
|Friends & Colleagues|
Wireless Network Planners
|UNTIL NEXT WEEK|
|THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK|
“A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for.”
|PHOTOS OF THE WEEK|
|Source:||The Washington Post|
|Home Page||Directory||Consulting||Newsletters||Free Subscription||Products||Reference||Glossary||Send e-mail|