newsletter logo

Wireless News Aggregation

Friday — July 3, 2015 — Issue No. 664

Paging and Wireless Messaging Home Page image Newsletter Archive image Carrier Directory image Recommended Products and Services
Reference Papers Consulting Glossary of Terms Send an e-mail to Brad Dye

Dear Friends of Wireless Messaging,

Welcome to The Wireless Messaging News. I hope you have a great weekend.

Why Police Agencies Still Can't Communicate In A Crisis

A longstanding problem; an expensive solution

by Matt Stroud

The four separate police agencies involved in the disorganized response to last summer's protests in Ferguson, Mo., couldn't easily talk to each other.

It might seem inconceivable that inter-agency communication would be a problem in 2015. But nine years after The 9/11 Commission Report recommended better communications between agencies, and decades since federal reports began identifying problems with how first responders co-ordinate, there are still no federal standards in place. While there has been some progress toward a nationwide solution, it's still a long way off.

A draft summary of a Justice Department report on the law enforcement response to the Ferguson protests, which was leaked first to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, makes brief mention of the apparent communication breakdown among cops in Ferguson. As tweeted by the New York Times 's Matt Apuzzo:

“The problem is, you have something like 18,000 agencies all across the country, most of them with fewer then 10 people in the department,” says Raymond E. Foster, a retired Los Angeles Police Department lieutenant and author of Police Technology. “They use their own equipment on their own frequency. Some of them even have their own language”—using different ten-codes for communications over police radios. A 2012 Congressional Research Service report says a nationwide solution would need to include such teams as 911 dispatchers and emergency medical technicians, which would put the number of agencies at 65,000 nationwide.

The solution is twofold: establishing a broadband frequency that those agencies can access, and making sure everyone at those agencies has the equipment to use it. That's not a small or cheap task. The 2012 CRS report puts the estimated cost of the broadband setup “in the tens of billions of dollars,” while radios could cost between $500 and $6,000 for each responder at every one of those 65,000 agencies.

There has been progress. In 2012, Congress passed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, which included $7 billion in funding for FirstNet the national First Responder Network Authority. The authority would begin the process of establishing a public safety broadband network, which would set up its core in Reston, Va. States will then be required to build their own networks to tap into that core. A new CRS report released in May called FirstNet "an important step toward reaching what has been a national goal since September 11, 2001." Still in planning phases, construction has not yet officially begun, though grants were given to five "early builder" projects. The CRS report warns that, as FirstNet pushes forward, ““states may consider the federal presence excessive and cease to cooperate with FirstNet, jeopardizing the purpose of the network.”

That wouldn't be unprecedented. Dysfunctional emergency communications among agencies stretch as far back as 1967, when President Lyndon Johnson’s Commission on Law Enforcement cited the problem of “many separate police communications systems in close proximity” complicating simple interactions among agencies and with civilians.

The goal is to have FirstNet's network in place and operational by 2022. Foster is skeptical that it or any other program will solve the nation's emergency communication problems. “There’s probably a way to make this work nationwide,” Foster says. “We just haven’t been able to.”

Now on to more news and views

The Weather in
Wayne County‚ Illinois

Find more about Weather in Fairfield, IL
Click for weather forecast

Wireless Messaging News
  • Emergency Radio Communications
  • Wireless Messaging
  • Critical Messaging
  • Telemetry
  • Paging
  • Wi-Fi
wireless logo medium

About Us

A new issue of the Wireless Messaging Newsletter is posted on the web each week. A notification goes out by e-mail to subscribers on most Fridays around noon central US time. The notification message has a link to the actual newsletter on the web. That way it doesn’t fill up your incoming e-mail account.

There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. Readers are a very select group of wireless industry professionals, and include the senior managers of many of the world’s major Paging and Wireless Messaging companies. There is an even mix of operations managers, marketing people, and engineers — so I try to include items of interest to all three groups. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.

I regularly get readers’ comments, so this newsletter has become a community forum for the Paging, and Wireless Messaging communities. You are welcome to contribute your ideas and opinions. Unless otherwise requested, all correspondence addressed to me is subject to publication in the newsletter and on my web site. I am very careful to protect the anonymity of those who request it.

I spend the whole week searching the Internet for news that I think may be of interest to you — so you won’t have to. This newsletter is an aggregator — a service that aggregates news from other news sources. You can help our community by sharing any interesting news that you find.

Editorial Policy

Editorial Opinion pieces present only the opinions of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any of advertisers or supporters. This newsletter is independent of any trade association.

Back To Paging


Still The Most Reliable Protocol For Wireless Messaging!


* required field

If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter just fill in the blanks in the form above, and then click on the “Subscribe” button.

There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.



Valid CSS!


Can You Help The Newsletter?

left arrow

You can help support The Wireless Messaging News by clicking on the PayPal Donate button above. It is not necessary to be a member of PayPal to use this service.

Reader Support

Newspapers generally cost 75¢ $1.50 a copy and they hardly ever mention paging or wireless messaging, unless in a negative way. If you receive some benefit from this publication maybe you would like to help support it financially?

A donation of $50.00 would certainly help cover a one-year period. If you are wiling and able, please click on the PayPal Donate button above.

Newsletter Advertising


If you are reading this, your potential customers are reading it as well. Please click here to find out about our advertising options.

Autumn CMA Convention in Prague, Czech Republic


The  Autumn CMA Convention will take place on September 30 – October 2, 2015 in Prague at the 5-star  Hilton Old Town Prague Hotel . Hotel bookings can be made at: . Please register your attendance with Derek Banner at

Set on the Vltava River and with its bustling Old Town Square and ancient architecture, Prague boasts a rich cultural scene and lively nightlife. The Hilton Prague Old Town hotel is in the heart of the city, situated at the gates to the Old Town with the Old Town Square, Wenceslas Square, and Charles Bridge all just a few minutes walk away. It is also within walking distance of shops, restaurants, and other attractions. The hotel benefits from both a pool and a gymnasium just in case you feel the need to work off the excesses of a CMA conference. Prague’s Václav Havel Airport is a 30-minute drive away from the hotel.

This year we plan to concentrate on the future of Critical Messaging but with a focus on the use of other complementary technologies such as LTE, TETRA, M2M, e-mail, voicemail etc. In doing so we will invite contacts from these industries to contribute to the discussions/presentations.

This will be an informal meeting with chances to network, the dress code will be smart informal.

The conference fee for CMA-E and CMA-A members will be $150. Non-members will be charged $1500 per person for the whole meeting. On Thursday 1st October we will have a group dinner at a local Prague restaurant.

This is a great opportunity to meet with colleagues in the same industry from Australia, the USA and Europe, potential suppliers, potential customers and to find out what is going on in other countries so please do your best to attend.

Source: CMA Europe

Advertiser Index

American Messaging  
Critical Alert  
Critical Response Systems  
Easy Solutions  
Falcon Wireless Direct  
Hark Technologies  
Ira Wiesenfeld & Associates  
Leavitt Communications  
Preferred Wireless  
Prism Paging  
Product Support Services — (PSSI) 
Paging & Wireless Network Planners LLC — (Ron Mercer) 
STI Engineering  
UltraTek Security Cameras  
WaveWare Technologies

Falcon Wireless Direct


Voluntary Newsletter Supporters By Donation

Kansas City


Premium Newsletter Supporter


gcs logo

Premium Newsletter Supporter

Canyon Ridge Communications

canyon ridge

Premium Newsletter Supporter

ProPage Inc.


Newsletter Supporter

Metropolitan Communications


Newsletter Supporter

e*Message Wireless Information Services Europe

Newsletter Supporter

Incyte Capital Holdings LLC
Dallas, Texas

Newsletter Supporter

Le Réseau Mobilité Plus
Montreal, Quebec


Newsletter Supporter

Communication Specialists

communication specialists

Newsletter Supporter

Cook Paging

cook paging

Premium Newsletter Supporter



Premium Newsletter Supporter

Citipage Ltd.
Edmonton, Alberta


Newsletter Supporter

Prism Paging

white stripe


white stripe


  • VoIP telephone access — eliminate interconnect expense
  • Call from anywhere — Prism SIP Gateway allows calls from PSTN and PBX
  • All the Features for Paging, Voice-mail, Text-to-Pager, Wireless and DECT phones
  • Prism Inet, the new IP interface for TAP, TNPP, SNPP, SMTP — Industry standard message input
  • Direct Connect to NurseCall, Assisted Living, Aged Care, Remote Monitoring, Access Control Systems


Cops and anti-gun advocates warn against 'deathtrap' iPhone case shaped as handgun: 'This is going to get our kids killed'

Published: Tuesday, June 30, 2015, 12:47 PM

Some of the cases come with an app that puts up a picture of a gun on the screen — completing the overall image.



The gun handles cases are sold online as well as from street vendors unfortunately, and come with an app that puts a picture of a gun barrel on the iPhone's screen.




Community advocate Tony Herbert wants legislators to ban an iPhone case that looks like a gun.

It might protect your iPhone, but it could also get you killed.

A new iPhone case that’s shaped like the grip of a handgun was blasted on Tuesday by cops and anti-gun advocates as “a deathtrap.”

Concerned critics demanded the gun-grip cases be banned from being sold on the Internet and stores, saying they can easily be mistaken for a real firearm. “This is the stupidest, most dangerous thing I’ve ever seen,” said one former cop who spoke anonymously of the accessory.

Making matters worse is that the gun-handle cases — which can be purchased online or from street vendors throughout the city — also come with an app that puts a picture of a gun barrel on the iPhone’s screen.

They will no doubt doom teens who are caught with the pistol cases sticking out of their pockets, law enforcement officials said.

“I would NOT suggest purchasing this cell phone case, which is designed to look like a firearm,” a tweet from the NYPD’s 112th Precinct in Queens read on Tuesday.

The head of the city’s largest police union predicted the cases will endanger “both the lives of those who carry it and the police officers whose job it is to rid the street of illegal guns.”

“The money that is earned from the sale of this case is blood money earned from the blood of the person who is foolish enough to carry it,” said Patrick Lynch, president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association.

Brooklyn community activist Tony Herbert agreed.

“If I were a cop and it was dark and I saw this (case) on a person, my first thought would be to pull my gun and defuse the threat,” Herbert said at a press conference on Tuesday.

Inez Rodriguez, 62, a member of Grandmothers Love Over Violence, an anti-violence group in Brooklyn, said the cases would only invite trouble. “They think it’s cute, but this is going to get our kids killed,” Rodriguez said.

The gun cases for the iPhone 5 and 6 sell from $10 to $49 and come in black, white and pink, according to “Protect your phone from scratches, shocks and collisions,” the website states. “Moreover, make your mobile phone shining and special.”

The website, which also sells the gun grip case and the app, advertised them as accessories that transform “your iPhone 5 into a handgun!”

“The app means you can play games of Russian roulette at parties! Don’t worry, you can’t actually shoot anyone!” the site tastelessly boasts.

Herbert is pushing city and state legislators to ban the sale of the phone case. “We have to ban the sale of this item before lives are lost,” he said.

Calls to about the gun cases — which are sold from a third-party seller — were not returned. An Apple representative said the company has nothing to do with the product and declined further comment.

Joash Fynx, a black teen from the Bronx, said he was too smart to carry such a dumb thing around.

“If a person of my race had something like that, it would be really dangerous,” said Fynx, 19, who added, “Something like that can easily be mistaken for a weapon, especially in a bad neighborhood.”

His friend, Ka Ren Liu, 17, said, “And the NYPD would, of course, take action first without waiting for you to explain.”


Product Support Services, Inc.

Repair and Refurbishment Services

pssi logo


Product Support Services, Inc.

511 South Royal Lane
Coppell, Texas 75019
(972) 462-3970 Ext. 261 left arrow left arrow

PSSI is the industry leader in reverse logistics, our services include depot repair, product returns management, RMA and RTV management, product audit, test, refurbishment, re-kitting and value recovery.

False Alert: Can You Really Trust that Tweet for Emergency Communications?

Will disinformation campaigns become a growing trend that undermine recent advances in spreading important information during emergencies?

Dan Lohrmann | July 1, 2015
Emergency Management

Over the past few years, there has been skyrocketing growth in the use of social media to get the word out during emergency situations. From fires to disease outbreaks to police shootings, more and more people turn to Twitter, Facebook or other social media sites to get the latest updates on incidents from reliable sources and “friends.”

Earlier this year, Emergency Management magazine ran a story titled: Can You Make Disaster Information Go Viral ? In that piece, new efforts were highlighted to improve the reliability of emergency communications using social media during man-made and natural disasters.

I applaud these social media efforts, and this emergency management communications trend has been a very good thing up to this point. But dark clouds are on the horizon. And soon, maybe you'll need to hold-off on that retweet.

Why? This game-changing story from The New York Times shows how highly coordinated disinformation campaigns can spell big problems for emergency communications in the future.

No, I’m not talking about some bystander who got a few facts wrong about a car accident.

The NYT article describes pros who set out to convince you to act with detailed misinformation. Here’s an excerpt:

On Dec. 13, two months after a handful of Ebola cases in the United States touched off a minor media panic, many of the same Twitter accounts used to spread the Columbian Chemicals hoax began to post about an outbreak of Ebola in Atlanta. The campaign followed the same pattern of fake news reports and videos, this time under the hashtag #EbolaInAtlanta, which briefly trended in Atlanta. Again, the attention to detail was remarkable, suggesting a tremendous amount of effort. ...

On the same day as the Ebola hoax, a totally different group of accounts began spreading a rumor that an unarmed black woman had been shot to death by police. They all used the hashtag #shockingmurderinatlanta.

This is a really big deal folks, and not just for emergency management teams. No doubt, there has always been false or misleading information online , but this deliberate attempt to deceive and misdirect people in crisis situations is taking matters to an entirely new level. Mistakes can and will be made in every communication effort, but actively broadcasting detailed instructions that could intentionally result in harm is another matter.

But before I explain why I am concerned, I urge you to go back and read (or at least skim) The NY Times article called The Agency , which explains that “from a nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, Russia, an army of well-paid ‘trolls’ has tried to wreak havoc all around the Internet — and in real-life American communities.”

In my opinion, this is probably just the beginning of a growing trend, and there is likely much worse to come.

More Background On Using Social Media For Emergency Management

If you google the phrase “twitter for emergencies,” you’ll get more than 35 million page views. There are articles like this excellent piece from Emergency Management magazine that described how Twitter launched an alert system for emergencies back in 2013.

Participating U.S. organizations include the American Red Cross , all ten Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regions for emergency response and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , as well as state and local agencies such as the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management .

According to Twitter, emergency features are available to local, national and international organizations that “provide critical information to the general public.” Organizations that want to use the program can request enrollment via Twitter’s site.

Here is a brief video describing the use of Twitter for emergencies:

Other articles, such as this blog , describe the use of social media for wildfire communication in Colorado, sending Amber Alerts for missing children and relaying information during health emergencies .

In the last case, here is a quote regarding the spread of information for the Ebola emergencies in Africa:

“Tweets regarding the Ebola outbreak had reached more than 60 million people in three days prior to official announcements of the outbreak, as per the study.”

Notice that millions of people were relying on tweets for information before the official announcement was made. While that appears to be a very good thing in this case, what if bad information (that looked very legitimate) was being spread to 60 million people?

Me Worry?

Some readers may be thinking: Isn’t this story overblown? Aren’t these vetted sources for Twitter data? Won’t people go to the reliable sources for their trusted emergency management information?

Sadly, that is not always the case, as security professionals know regarding phishing scams with e-mails and plenty of other online methods used to trick people into believing viral content or worse.

There are many ways for false information to spread online that can be used by bad guys with Twitter and other sites. While I won’t list all those ways in this blog, I will say that changing a few letters in a name, using shortened URLs or hyper-linking to bad information while using the label from a respected name are just a few methods used to misdirect people. The very features that make social media so popular (such as easy re-tweets) are the same methods that can be used to trick others to act by the bad guys.

The reality is that sophisticated actors that are intent on doing harm can create lots of problems for emergency management communications systems using social media.

Will this NYT story be a one-off example or the beginning of a scary trend that will grow? I certainly don’t know the answer to that question, since I can't predict the future. I won’t go into bad guy motives or offer some potential aids in this piece, but I do want to say one more reason that this NYT story matters right now.

An Online Trend Story from the Past Applies Here

Back in 2006 when I was Michigan CISO, we were one state engaged in the CYBERSTORM I exercise with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), law enforcement agencies, other states and even other countries. After several days of practice with defending our computer systems against cyberattacks, all hell broke loose during this test of our online (and offline) defenses. For example, bombs were going off at data centers, everything was getting hacked and systems were being compromised.

REMINDER — This was just a cyber exercise or test of our team's incident response capabilities. Still, that cyber exercise now reminds me of movies like Die Hard 4 .

Anyway, near the end of the exercise, we needed to purchase a new Bull Mainframe in order to get citizens services online again, so we stated making calls to get a Bull Mainframe fast. The trouble was, we quickly learned, only one Bull Mainframe was available in the entire world.

The exercise planners even simulated a salesman with a French accent who wanted $40 million for the Bull Mainframe box (which we thought was only worth $10 million.) We ended up negotiating and buying it for $20 million during this exercise simulation.

A few days later, I remember members of my team complaining during the cyber exercise hotwash that the extortion threats were “completely unrealistic.” Several people said: “No one will ever hold us ransom for money during a cyberattack!”

I agreed and even boldly asked the exercise planners: "Why was that extortion situation even in CYBERSTORM I?”

Little did we know that ransomware would become one of the hottest malware issues around and the No. 1 cyberthreat in 2013.

Looking back, we experienced, but didn’t understand, the implications of a coming trend. The threat of extortion and of ransomware were clearly evident and being included in cyber exercises back in 2006 or earlier. Of course, hindsight is 20/20, and I now see the error of my short-term and narrow thinking on cyberextortion.

Back to Emergency Management and Social Media

Which leads me to ask similar questions about new social media communication trends. Could similar things happen with troll farms that happened with ransomware and extortion?

Will misinformation on Twitter and Facebook hoaxes or other social media fraud undermine the benefits offered by these excellent infrastructure tools? Only time will tell. For now, it all comes back to vetted sources, and Internet reputations and reliable, verifiable information.

Emergency management personnel need to consistently go the extra mile to ensure that subscribers to their social media alerts understand and follow appropriate procedures.

Nevertheless, in an emergency situation with only seconds to spare, it always comes down to this very personal question: Can I trust that tweet? Really?

This column was originally published by Government Technology .

Source: Emergency Management  

American Messaging


American Messaging


WaveWare Technologies

2630 National Dr., Garland, TX 75041

Now stocking the full line of Daviscomms paging products

New Products

SPS-5v9E Paging System

  • 1 Serial Port Connection
  • 2 Ethernet Connections
  • Browser and Serial Port Configuration
  • TAP, COMP2, Scope, WaveWare SNPP, COMP2, & PET Protocols
  • 2W, 5W Option

DMG Protocol Converter

  • Linux Based Embedded System
  • Up to 4 Serial Port Connections
  • Ethernet Connections
  • Browser Configuration
  • Protocol Conversion
  • Additional Protocols Available Soon

WaveWare Technologies

Easy Solutions

easy solutions

Easy Solutions provides cost effective computer and wireless solutions at affordable prices. We can help in most any situation with your communications systems. We have many years of experience and a vast network of resources to support the industry, your system and an ever changing completive landscape.

  • We treat our customers like family. We don’t just fix problems . . . We recommend and implement better cost effective solutions.
  • We are not just another vendor . . . We are a part of your team. All the advantages of high priced full time employment without the cost.
  • We are not in the Technical Services business . . . We are in the Customer Satisfaction business.

Experts in Paging Infrastructure

  • Glenayre, Motorola, Unipage, etc.
  • Excellent Service Contracts
  • Full Service—Beyond Factory Support
  • Contracts for Glenayre and other Systems starting at $100
  • Making systems More Reliable and MORE PROFITABLE for over 30 years.

Please see our web site for exciting solutions designed specifically for the Wireless Industry. We also maintain a diagnostic lab and provide important repair and replacement parts services for Motorola and Glenayre equipment. Call or e-mail us for more information.

Easy Solutions
3220 San Simeon Way
Plano, Texas 75023

Vaughan Bowden
Telephone: 972-898-1119

Easy Solutions

The 'father of SMS,' Matti Makkonen, dies at 63

by Jon Fingas
June 30th 2015 At 10:06 am

It's a sad day in the cellphone world. Matti Makkonen , widely considered the “father of SMS,” has died from illness at the age of 63. The Finnish creator pitched the concept of text messaging over cellular networks in 1984 and helped get the ball rolling on the technology in its earliest days. He was quick to downplay his involvement and saw SMS as a “joint effort” between many people (Friedham Hillebrand developed the 160-character format in 1985, for example), but much of the initial credit belongs to him.

Suffice it to say that Makkonen's work has spread far and wide. SMS is starting to decline as instant messaging apps take over , but it's still ubiquitous — how many people do you know who would much rather get a text message than a phone call? Twitter's roots are in SMS (hence that 140-character limit), and the tech is still considered vital for communication in areas where mobile internet access is too expensive, heavily censored or both. We'll miss you, Matti.

Source: engadget (Thanks to Barry Kanne)

Ivy Corp  UltraTek Security Cameras



Please click the Learn More button.

security camera



Monitor your home, or business, “Day or Night.” True motion detection “turn-on and record” for “current” or “future viewing.” May be set up via Wi-Fi using the Wi-Fi capable unit.

All information is on the site: left arrow

or call, Jim, 1-662-284-6724

Critical Response Systems

More than Paging.
First Responder Solutions.

Our patented technology notifies clinical personnel immediately, while tracking who receives and responds to each alarm. Users confirm or defer each event with a single button press, and analytic dashboards display response statistics in real time, as well as historically broken down by time, unit, room, and individual.

Our systems not only notify your personnel quickly and reliably, but also provide actionable feedback to fine-tune your procedures, reduce unnecessary alarms, and improve patient outcomes.


Cell phone alerts used 'for the right cases'

6/27/2015 6:01:00 AM

Scott Orr
The Daily Courier


PRESCOTT—When authorities became aware that kidnapping victim Cassidy Hayes might be in Arizona Monday, June 22, tens of thousands of smartphones sounded a loud tone and a text message warned users of an Amber Alert.

Residents in the Valley are familiar with this system, called Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA)-they get fairly frequent alerts this time of year, warning of severe monsoon weather.

Department of Public Safety Director Col. Frank Milstead said on Tuesday that he realizes the alerts can seem annoying-he pointed to the Phoenix-area weather alerts that happen "in the middle of the night and it's about a dust storm"-but the Amber Alerts are important.

"We use it infrequently and, I think, we use it for the right cases," he said. "This is not about 'somebody didn't come home,' this is that we know there's an abduction."

The WEA system has been operated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) since 2012. In 2006, the federal government passed the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act, charging the FCC with creating a network that would use technology called "cell broadcast" to deliver the messages to large groups.

The alerts go out to modern smart phones when the agency authorizes them. The alerts are geographically-based, so not everybody receives every warning.

Think of it as the 21st century equivalent of the old television and radio Emergency Broadcast System.

Alerts fall into three categories:

  • Presidential: Alerts issued by the President or a designee, generally dealing with national security;
  • Imminent Threat: Alerts that include severe man-made or natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, or monsoon storms, where an imminent threat to life or property exists;
  • Amber Alerts: Alerts that meet the U.S. Department of Justice's criteria to help law enforcement search for and locate an abducted child.

The message your phone receives will be no more than 90 characters long and you're not charged for it.

It works on a system independent of your usual text messaging app.

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children said that at least 19 children nationwide have been rescued because of tips received via WEA Amber Alerts. It's difficult to assess the number of people saved by WEA alerts about severe weather, but there are many anecdotal examples like the 29 children saved from a tornado in Connecticut by a camp counselor who got an alert and moved the kids to safety minutes before the camp was destroyed.

Today's phones come with WEA activated by default. Your wireless carrier allows you to deactivate Imminent Threat and Amber alerts, but not Presidential alerts. To deactivate alerts, contact your carrier or check their website for instructions.

Or, you could just do what they do at Prescott's Tec Rehab, where they have a drawer full of phones in for repairs.

"We had, probably, 25 phones all go off at the same time," said Tec Rehab's Chris Seistrup, laughing.

"I just hit the volume-down button," he said.

Follow Scott Orr on Twitter @AZNewsguy. Reach him at 928-445-3333 ext. 2038, or 928-642-7705.

Source: The Daily Courier Prescott, Arizona

Leavitt Communications


Specialists in sales and service of equipment from these leading manufacturers, as well as other two-way radio and paging products:

UNICATIONbendix king

motorola blue Motorola SOLUTIONS

COMmotorola red Motorola MOBILITY spacer
Philip C. Leavitt
Leavitt Communications
7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
Web Site:
Mobile phone:847-494-0000
Skype ID:pcleavitt

STI Engineering

sti header

250W VHF Paging Transmitter

STI Engineering’s RFI-148 250 high performance paging transmitter features true DDS frequency generation that enables precise control and flexibility for a wide range of data transmission applications.

The transmitter is particularly suitable for large simulcast POCSAG and FLEX paging networks and can be used as drop-in replacement of older and obsolete transmitters. The unit has a proven track record in large scale critical messaging systems.

sti tx
  • High power output
    (selectable from 20 W - 250 W)
  • SNMP Diagnostics and alarms
  • Full VHF Band coverage
    (138-174 MHz)
  • DSP precision modulation
  • Integrated isolator
  • Sniffer port for in-rack receiver
  • Remote firmware upgrade capability
  • Software selectable frequency offset
  • Adjustable absolute delay correction
  • Front panel diagnostics
  • Hardware alarm outputs
  • High frequency stability
  • External reference option
  • FCC and ACMA approved
  • CE compliant version in development
sti22 Boulder Road Malaga 6090 Western Australia
Telephone:  +61 8 9209 0900
Facsimile:  +61 8 9248 2833

How States Are Fighting to Keep Towns From Offering Their Own Broadband

June 30, 2015
by Leticia Miranda
Moyers & Company

(Photo: Sean MacEntee/Flickr CC 2.0)

Earlier this year, the Federal Communications Commission voted to ease the way for cities to become Internet service providers. So-called municipal broadband is already a reality in a few towns, often providing Internet access and faster service to rural communities that cable companies don’t serve.

The cable and telecommunications industry have long lobbied against city-run broadband , arguing that taxpayer money should not fund potential competitors to private companies.

The telecom companies have what may seem like an unlikely ally: states. Roughly 20 states have restrictions against municipal broadband.

And the attorneys general in North Carolina and Tennessee have recently filed lawsuits in an attempt to overrule the FCC and block towns in these states from expanding publicly funded Internet service.

North Carolina’s attorney general argued in a suit filed last month that the “FCC unlawfully inserted itself between the State and the State’s political subdivisions.” Tennessee’s attorney general filed a similar suit in March.

Tennessee has hired one of the country’s largest telecom lobbying and law firms, Wiley Rein, to represent the state in its suit. The firm, founded by a former FCC chairman, has represented AT&T, Verizon and Qwest, among others.

James Tierney, director of the National State Attorneys General Program at Columbia Law School, said it is not unusual for attorneys general to seek outside counsel for specialized cases that they view as a priority.

Asked about the suit, the Tennessee attorney general’s office told ProPublica , “This is a question of the state’s sovereign ability to define the role of its local governmental units.” North Carolina Attorney General’s office said in a statement that the “legal defense of state laws by the Attorney General’s office is a statutory requirement.”

As the New York Times detailed last year, state attorneys general have become a major target of corporate lobbyists and contributors including AT&T, Comcast and T-Mobile.

North Carolina is no exception. The state’s Attorney General Roy Cooper received roughly $35,000 from the telecommunications industry in his 2012 run for office. Only the state’s retail industry gave more .

The donations are just a small part of contributions the industry has made in the states. In North Carolina’s 2014 elections, the telecommunications industry gave a combined $870,000 to candidates in both parties , which made it one of the top industries to contribute that year. Candidates in Tennessee received nearly $921,000 from AT&T and other industry players in 2014 .

The FCC’s decision came after two towns – City of Wilson in North Carolina and Chattanooga in Tennessee – appealed to the agency to be able to expand their networks.

The vote has rattled some companies. In a government filing earlier this year, Comcast cited the FCC’s decision as a risk to the company’s business : “Any changes to the regulatory framework applicable to any of our services or businesses could have a negative impact on our businesses and results of operations.”

If the court upholds the FCC’s authority to preempt restrictions in North Carolina and Tennessee, it may embolden other cities to file petitions with the agency, according to lawyer Jim Baller, who represents Wilson and the Chattanooga Electric Power Board. “A victory by the FCC would be a very welcome result for many communities across America,” said Baller.

For some residents in and outside of Chattanooga, clearing the way to city-run broadband would mean the sort of faster Internet access that others might take for granted.

For 12 years, Eva VanHook, 39, of Georgetown, Tennessee, lived with a satellite broadband connection so slow that she’d read a book while waiting for a web page to load. In order for her son to access online materials for his school assignments, she’d drive him 12 miles to their church parking lot, where he could access faster WiFi.

Charter, the local Internet service provider, declined several requests by her husband to build lines out to her home. Only last month did Charter connect her home to the Internet. “Even the possibility to jump on [the local utility’s] gigabit network would blow our minds right now,” VanHook said. “There is nothing faster than Chattanooga. Just through meeting them and hearing them speak and having them understand what’s going on, that’s the kind of place I want to do business.”

Leticia Miranda is a reporting fellow at ProPublica . She is a recent graduate of New York University’s Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute, where she was a dean’s fellow. Her work has appeared in both national and local outlets including The Nation, Colorlines and City Limits. You can follow her on Twitter @letidmiranda .
Source: Moyers & Company (Thanks to Jim Dombrouski)

Leavitt Communications

its stil here

It’s still here — the tried and true Motorola Alphamate 250. Now owned, supported, and available from Leavitt Communications. Call us for new or reconditioned units, parts, manuals, and repairs.

We also offer refurbished Alphamate 250s, Alphamate IIs, the original Alphamate and new and refurbished pagers, pager repairs, pager parts and accessories. We are FULL SERVICE in Paging!

E-mail Phil Leavitt ( ) for pricing and delivery information or for a list of other available paging and two-way related equipment.

black line

Phil Leavitt

leavitt logo

7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253

Hark Technologies

hark logo

Wireless Communication Solutions

USB Paging Encoder

paging encoder

  • Single channel up to eight zones
  • Connects to Linux computer via USB
  • Programmable timeouts and batch sizes
  • Supports 2-tone, 5/6-tone, POCSAG 512/1200/2400, GOLAY
  • Supports Tone Only, Voice, Numeric, and Alphanumeric
  • PURC or direct connect
  • Pictured version mounts in 5.25" drive bay
  • Other mounting options available
  • Available as a daughter board for our embedded Internet Paging Terminal (IPT)

Paging Data Receiver (PDR)


  • Frequency agile—only one receiver to stock
  • USB or RS-232 interface
  • Two contact closures
  • End-user programmable w/o requiring special hardware
  • 16 capcodes
  • Eight contact closure version also available
  • Product customization available

Other products

Please see our web site for other products including Internet Messaging Gateways, Unified Messaging Servers, test equipment, and Paging Terminals.

Hark Technologies
717 Old Trolley Rd Ste 6 #163
Summerville, SC 29485
Tel: 843-821-6888
Fax: 843-821-6894
E-mail: left arrow CLICK
Web: left arrow CLICK

hark David George and Bill Noyes
of Hark Technologies.

Hark Technologies

Preferred Wireless

preferred logo

Terminals & Controllers:
1ASC1500 Complete, w/Spares  
3CNET Platinum Controllers 
2GL3100 RF Director 
1GL3000 ES — 2 Chassis
1GL3000L Complete w/Spares
40SkyData 8466 B Receivers
1Unipage—Many Unipage Cards & Chassis
16Zetron M66 Transmitter Controllers  
Link Transmitters:
4Glenayre QT4201 25W Midband Link TX
1Glenayre QT6994, 150W, 900 MHz Link TX
3Motorola 10W, 900 MHz Link TX (C35JZB6106)
2Eagle 900 MHz Link Transmitters, 60 & 80W
2Motorola Q2630A, 30W, UHF Link TX
VHF Paging Transmitters
19 Motorola Nucleus 125W CNET
6Motorola Nucleus 350W CNET
12Motorola Nucleus 350W Advanced Control
1Glenayre QT7505
1Glenayre QT8505
UHF Paging Transmitters:
16Glenayre UHF GLT5340, 125W, DSP Exciter
900 MHz Paging Transmitters:
2Glenayre GLT8200, 25W (NEW)
15Glenayre GLT-8500 250W
3Glenayre GLT 8600, 500W


Too Much To List • Call or E-Mail

Rick McMichael
Preferred Wireless, Inc.
888-429-4171 left arrow

Preferred Wireless





They say, “a squeaking wheel gets the grease.”

Adobe has updated their Creative Cloud (Internet authoring) applications so I need to replace one of my computers with a Mac Mini in order to run the new programs. If you would like to help sponsor this purchase, please click on the Donate button below.

left arrow

This newsletter is made possible by donations from readers, and advertising from vendors.

Critical Alert

spacer cas logo

Critical Alert Systems, Inc.

Formed in 2010, CAS brought together the resources and capabilities of two leading critical messaging solutions providers, UCOM™ and Teletouch™ Paging, along with lntego Systems™, a pioneer in next-generation nurse call systems. The result was an organization that represented more than 40 years of combined experience serving hospitals and healthcare providers.

CAS was created to be a single-source provider for hospitals and healthcare facilities in need of advanced nurse call and communications technologies.

Unlike our competitors, our product development process embraced the power of software from its inception. This enables us to design hardware-agnostic solutions focused on built-in integration, flexibility and advanced performance.


Nurse Call Solutions

Innovation in Nurse Call

Innovative, software-based nurse call solutions for acute and long-term care organizations.


Paging Solutions

The Most Reliable Paging Network

To this day, for critical messaging, nothing beats paging. It’s simply the best way to deliver a critical message.



© Copyright 2015 - Critical Alert Systems, Inc.

BloostonLaw Newsletter

Selected portions of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update, and/or the BloostonLaw Private Users Update — newsletters from the Law Offices of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP — are reproduced in this section with the firm’s permission.

BloostonLaw Telecom UpdateVol. 18, No. 27July 1, 2015

Commissioner Pai Provides First Details on Stand-Alone Broadband USF Support

This week, FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai issued a detailed press release outlining revisions he proposes to make to the FCC’s rules governing Universal Service Fund support for rural local exchange carriers to allow them to obtain support for stand-alone broadband services. Commissioner Pai’s proposal essentially allows stand-alone broadband to be included in high cost loop support and interstate common line support calculations. See the full article below for more information.


Commissioner Pai Details RLEC Stand-Alone Broadband Support Plan, Voluntary Model Participation

On June 29, Commissioner Ajit Pai issued a statement detailing his plan for supporting stand-alone broadband in rural areas, and providing proposed rule change language.

First, Pai proposes specific changes to rule section 54.303, which governs the calculation of support. The proposed changes would effectively include stand-alone broadband costs in high cost loop support and interstate common line support calculations. Further, the proposed changes would also determine how much of that support should be attributed to stand-alone broadband, and would direct that support be used to offset the cost of service.

Second, Pai proposes making participation in the currently-circulating alternative cost model for rate of return areas (A-CAM) strictly voluntary. Further, he proposes implementing a five-year transition period for carriers whose support would decrease under A-CAM, with no limit on participation by such carriers. Pai seems to suggest, however, that some limit would be necessary for carriers whose support would increase under A-CAM, noting that he is “open to using some of the reserves that have built up within the rate-of-return budget over the past few years to fund additional volunteers” but insisted “we must be fiscally responsible and prioritize participation for those areas that have the lowest build out of high-speed broadband.”

FCC Reaches Consent Decree with TracFone to Unlock Mobile Phones

As this edition of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update went to press, the FCC announced that it had entered into a Consent Decree with TracFone to resolve an investigation into whether TracFone had violated FCC rules by certifying compliance with industry consumer protection and service quality standards despite failing to allow unlocked handsets.

The investigation was prompted by TracFone’s FCC Form 481 filing for 2014, in which it certified that for the 2015 Lifeline program year it would comply with the CTIA – The Wireless Association® Consumer Code for Wireless Service (CTIA Code), which serves as a safe harbor for eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) to demonstrate that they have met the standards required to serve as an ETC. As of February 11, the CTIA Code included handset unlocking provisions, which require carriers to unlock handsets and disclose the same to consumers. Despite its certification, TracFone neither unlocked its handsets nor notified its customers.

Under the Consent Decree, TracFone will:

  • By September 1, 2015, provide clear notifications to its customers about its handset unlocking policy, and eligible non-Lifeline TracFone customers must be allowed to trade in their old device for a cash refund of the trade-in-value of the handset.
  • By May 1, 2016, allow eligible non-Lifeline TracFone customers to trade in their old device for an upgrade credit toward a new, unlockable handset, and provide new Lifeline customers with phones capable of being unlocked.
  • Provide a $400,000 per month offset to the Universal Service Fund until it provides unlockable handsets to new Lifeline customers.
  • By December 31, 2016, ensure that all phones launched by TracFone are capable of being unlocked.
  • Maintain the availability of the foregoing refunds, upgrade credits and replacement handsets through at least June 2018.

In adopting the Consent Decree, the FCC noted that TracFone was aware that it was not in compliance with the CTIA Code, as it had stated it had contracted to prevent unlocking as a security measure.

Waivers of Intercarrier Compensation Recovery Rules Granted

The Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB) has granted additional waivers of the intercarrier compensation recovery rules to a number of local exchange carriers (LECs) affected by the Halo Wireless, Inc. (Halo) bankruptcy. (WC Docket No. 10-90; CC Docket No. 01-92) Specifically, the WCB granted a waiver to a number of LECs that sought waiver of the rules to permit them to include uncollected revenues from Halo in their ICC Base Period Revenue (BPR). These waivers followed the Commission's earlier Order, released in August 2014, granting similar requests from two LECs seeking waiver of section 51.917(b)(7) of the Commission’s rules, that allowed the requesting carriers to include in their recovery calculations funds they were unable to collect from Halo.

In granting the waivers, the WCB found that "Petitioners have demonstrated good cause for waiver to allow them to add to their respective BPR calculations amounts reflecting intrastate access services and, in some cases, net reciprocal compensation for such traffic routed from Halo and terminated by Petitioners during FY 2011, and billed to, but not collected from, Halo." Further, according to the WCB, "absent such waivers, the unique combination of these circumstances would result in significant reductions to Petitioners’ ICC recovery mechanism revenues," which would continue far into the future.

The WCB granted the LECs' waiver requests subject to certain conditions. According to the WCB, "[p]rior to implementation of the relief granted in this Order, each petitioner must certify that: (1) it terminated all the traffic sent to it by Halo during FY 2011 that it seeks to add to its BPR calculations; (2) it billed Halo for such traffic during FY 2011 or before the close of the next regular billing cycle in Fiscal Year 2012 for the amounts to be added to its BPR calculations; (3) a court or regulatory agency of competent jurisdiction has made a finding of liability against Halo regarding the compensation for such traffic; (4) it filed a timely claim in the Halo bankruptcy case requesting compensation for such traffic; and (5) it did not include in its BPR adjustment amounts any interest, late payment fees, collection fees, or attorney fees." In addition, the WCB stated that any BPR adjustment for a study area resulting from the Order shall not exceed the unpaid compensation subject to the Commission’s recovery rules contained in a Petitioner’s bankruptcy claim for that study area.

FCC Extends Comment Deadlines on Special Access FNPRM

On June 24, the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau issued a Public Notice announcing the further extension of the deadlines for comments and reply comments in response to Section IV.B of its December 18, 2012 Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the special access proceeding. Comments are now due September 25; replies due October 16.

According to the Public Notice, The Bureau said it is in the process of allowing access to the data collected for interested parties to review (pursuant to the relevant Protective Order), and recognized that parties would not have adequate time to access and review the information collected prior to the current deadlines (July 1 and July 22).

Section IV.B of the FNPRM sought comment on possible changes to its rules for the special access services provided by ILECs in price cap areas. Specifically, the FCC is seeking comment on how the special access pricing flexibility rules might change after it conducts market analysis on the data collected, and on what steps the FCC should take where relief has been provided under the existing rules and where the data and analysis demonstrate that competition is not sufficient.

Law & Regulation

FCC Issues Tentative Agenda for July 16 Open Meeting

On June 25, the FCC issued the tentative agenda for its next Open Meeting, currently scheduled for July 16. At the meeting, the FCC will consider:

  • a Procedures Public Notice which adopts a set of auction procedures for the upcoming Incentive Auction; establishes and provides information on final procedures for setting the initial spectrum clearing target, qualifying to bid, and bidding in the reverse and forward auctions.
  • an Order on Reconsideration addressing petitions for reconsideration of certain aspects of the Mobile Spectrum Holdings Report and Order.
  • a Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, Third Order on Reconsideration and a Third Report and Order that provides “meaningful opportunities” for small businesses, rural telephone companies, and businesses owned by members of minority groups and women to participate in the provision of spectrum-based services, and also strengthens the Commission’s rules to protect against unjust enrichment to ineligible entities.

As always, the meeting is scheduled to commence at 10:30 a.m. EST and will be webcast live at .

FCC Reminds Antenna Structure Owners of Obligations

Recently, the FCC has noticed a trend where applications for antenna structure registration (ASR) contain defects that point to violations of the FCC’s ASR rules that could result in significant fines. These violations include:

  • Failing to obtain both a Determination of No Hazard from the Federal Aviation Administration and an ASR registration prior to constructing the antenna structure
  • Failing to notify the FCC within five days of completing construction of the tower or dismantling the tower
  • Installation of obstruction marking and lighting that differs from the specifications authorized by the FCC in the ASR system and/or specified on the Determination of No Hazard issued by the FAA.
  • Failing to update the ASR registration database upon receipt of a new/updated Determination of No Hazard from the FAA for an antenna structure.

Additionally, now that the FCC’s ASR application process includes an environmental assessment, the filing process has become more complex and confusing. The application is now a two-step process, with the second step occurring after the environmental process has been completed. As a result, the FCC is also taking this opportunity to remind applicants that ASR applicants may not prematurely certify that the antenna structure would not have a “significant environmental effect.” Doing so could result in the imposition of monetary forfeitures. In this regard, the FCC has found that this issue generally arises when the “Step 2” amendment is made, including:

  • The applicant uses ASR Certification Option No.1 (indicating that the construction is exempt from environmental notification due to another agency’s review before an environmental review has actually been completed);
  • The applicant uses ASR Certification Option No. 3 (environmental notification has been completed, and the FCC has notified the applicant that an Environmental assessment is not required before the Bureau has notified the applicant that an Environmental Assessment is not required); or
  • The applicant uses ASR Certification Option No. 4 (The FCC has issued a Finding of No Significant Impact before the FCC has issued a Finding of No Significant Impact).

In order to avoid the potential for monetary forfeitures, it is very important that our clients ensure that their ASR filings are made in a timely manner and in compliance with the FCC’s environmental rules. We recommend that clients consult us with any questions, to avoid fines.

Iowa Governor Signs Broadband Legislation

Last week, Iowa Governor Terry Branstad signed into law a piece of legislation known alternately as the “Connecting Iowa Farms, Schools, and Communities Act” or the “Connect Every Acre Bill”, which is intended to expand high-speed Internet and wireless communications in rural areas.
Provisions of the Act include:

  • Appointment of the State of Iowa Office of the Chief Information Officer to coordinate statewide broadband availability and access between the public and private sector.
  • Creation of the Iowa Farms, Schools and Communities Broadband Grant Program to award grants to communication service providers to invest broadband access to farms, schools and communities (for which the Iowa Fiscal Year 2016 budget reportedly includes $5 million).
  • Provision of a 100% property tax exemption for broadband infrastructure for infrastructure in place on or after July 1, 2014, for ten years.
  • Streamlining and expediting the permitting process by requiring permitting authorities for non-wireless broadband related permits to be done within sixty business days.

In signing the bill, Gov. Branstad said, “Our state already has a low unemployment rate of 3.8 percent but, to continue our growth, we must look at ways to encourage connecting every acre of Iowa to high-speed broadband,” and that he was pleased with the bipartisan support the bill received. “Together,” he said, “Iowa lawmakers came together to pass this meaningful legislation to continue building Iowa for the future.”


Charter Files Public Interest Statement on Time Warner / Bright House Mergers

Capitol Hill news outlet The Hill is reporting that Charter Communications filed a 362 page Statement of Public Interest with the FCC in an effort to support its multi-billion dollar deal with Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks.

In the mammoth filing, the cable company outlined a number of services it promised it would introduce and terms it would accept to serve the public interest, including strict adherence to the new Net Neutrality restrictions that went into effect mid-June. Other commitments include a minimum broadband speed of 60 Mbps at a lower price; no data caps, usage based pricing, modem fees, or early termination fees; and no passing-on federal or state Universal Service Fund fees to customers. New Charter also promised to “return TWC call center jobs to the United States” and hire “thousands of new employees” to handle customer services and field technician operations.


JULY 1: FCC FORM 481 (CARRIER ANNUAL REPORTING DATA COLLECTION FORM). All eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) must report the information required by Section 54.313, which includes outage, unfulfilled service request, and complaint data, broken out separately for voice and broadband services, information on the ETC’s holding company, operating companies, ETC affiliates and any branding in response to section 54.313(a)(8); its CAF-ICC certification, if applicable; its financial information, if a privately held rate-of-return carrier; and its satellite backhaul certification, if applicable. Form 481 must not only be filed with USAC, but also with the FCC and the relevant state commission and tribal authority, as appropriate. Although USAC treats the filing as confidential, filers must seek confidential treatment separately with the FCC and the relevant state commission and tribal authority if confidential treatment is desired.

JULY 1: MOBILITY FUND PHASE I ANNUAL REPORT. Winning bidders in Auction 901 that are authorized to receive Mobility Fund Phase I support are required to submit to the Commission an annual report each year on July 1 for the five years following authorization. Each annual report must be submitted to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, clearly referencing WT Docket No. 10-208; the Universal Service Administrator; and the relevant state commissions, relevant authority in a U.S. Territory, or Tribal governments, as appropriate. The information and certifications required to be included in the annual report are described in Section 54.1009 of the Commission’s rules.

JULY 31: FCC FORM 507, UNIVERSAL SERVICE QUARTERLY LINE COUNT UPDATE. Line count updates are required to recalculate a carrier's per line universal service support, and is filed with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). This information must be submitted on July 31 each year by all rate-of-return incumbent carriers, and on a quarterly basis if a competitive eligible telecommunications carrier (CETC) has initiated service in the rate-of-return incumbent carrier’s service area and reported line count data to USAC in the rate-of-return incumbent carrier’s service area, in order for the incumbent carrier to be eligible to receive Interstate Common Line Support (ICLS). This quarterly filing is due July 31 and covers lines served as of December 31, 2014. Incumbent carriers filing on a quarterly basis must also file on September 30 (for lines served as of March 31, 2015); December 30 (for lines served as of June 30, 2015), and March 31, 2016, for lines served as of September 30, 2015).

JULY 31: CARRIER IDENTIFICATION CODE (CIC) REPORTS. Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Reports must be filed by the last business day of July (this year, July 31). These reports are required of all carriers who have been assigned a CIC code by NANPA. Failure to file could result in an effort by NANPA to reclaim it, although according to the Guidelines this process is initiated with a letter from NANPA regarding the apparent non-use of the CIC code. The assignee can then respond with an explanation. (Guidelines Section 6.2). The CIC Reporting Requirement is included in the CIC Assignment Guidelines, produced by ATIS. According to section 1.4 of that document: At the direction of the NANPA, the access providers and the entities who are assigned CICs will be requested to provide access and usage information to the NANPA, on a semi-annual basis to ensure effective management of the CIC resource. (Holders of codes may respond to the request at their own election). Access provider and entity reports shall be submitted to NANPA no later than January 31 for the period ending December 31, and no later than July 31 for the period ending June 30. It is also referenced in the NANPA Technical Requirements Document, which states at 7.18.6: CIC holders shall provide a usage report to the NANPA per the industry CIC guidelines … The NAS shall be capable of accepting CIC usage reports per guideline requirements on January 31 for the period ending December 31 and no later than July 31 for the period ending June 30. These reports may also be mailed and accepted by the NANPA in paper form. Finally, according to the NANPA website, if no local exchange carrier reports access or usage for a given CIC, NANPA is obliged to reclaim it. The semi-annual utilization and access reporting mechanism is described at length in the guidelines.

AUGUST 1: FCC FORM 499-Q, TELECOMMUNICATIONS REPORTING WORKSHEET. All telecommunications common carriers that expect to contribute more than $10,000 to federal Universal Service Fund (USF) support mechanisms must file this quarterly form. The FCC has modified this form in light of its recent decision to establish interim measures for USF contribution assessments. The form contains revenue information from the prior quarter plus projections for the next quarter. Form 499-Q relates only to USF contributions. It does not relate to the cost recovery mechanisms for the Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Fund, the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA), and the shared costs of local number portability (LNP), which are covered in the annual form (Form 499-A) that was due April 1.

AUGUST 1: FCC FORM 502, NUMBER UTILIZATION AND FORECAST REPORT: Any wireless or wireline carrier (including paging companies) that have received number blocks—including 100, 1,000, or 10,000 number blocks—from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), a Pooling Administrator, or from another carrier, must file Form 502 by August 1. Carriers porting numbers for the purpose of transferring an established customer’s service to another service provider must also report, but the carrier receiving numbers through porting does not. Resold services should also be treated like ported numbers, meaning the carrier transferring the resold service to another carrier is required to report those numbers but the carrier receiving such numbers should not report them. Reporting carriers file utilization and forecast reports semiannually on or before February 1 for the preceding six-month reporting period ending December 31, and on or before August 1 for the preceding six-month reporting period ending June 30.

AUGUST 29: COPYRIGHT STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS. The Copyright Statement of Accounts form plus royalty payment for the first half of calendar year 2015 is due to be filed August 29 at the Library of Congress’ Copyright Office by cable TV service providers.

SEPTEMBER 1: FCC FORM 477, LOCAL COMPETITION AND BROADBAND REPORTING FORM. Three types of entities must file this form. (1) Facilities-based Providers of Broadband Connections to End User Locations: Entities that are facilities-based providers of broadband connections — which are wired “lines” or wireless “channels” that enable the end user to receive information from and/or send information to the Internet at information transfer rates exceeding 200 kbps in at least one direction — must complete and file the applicable portions of this form for each state in which the entity provides one or more such connections to end user locations. For the purposes of Form 477, an entity is a “facilities-based” provider of broadband connections to end user locations if it owns the portion of the physical facility that terminates at the end user location, if it obtains unbundled network elements (UNEs), special access lines, or other leased facilities that terminate at the end user location and provisions/equips them as broadband, or if it provisions/equips a broadband wireless channel to the end user location over licensed or unlicensed spectrum. Such entities include incumbent and competitive local exchange carriers (LECs), cable system operators, fixed wireless service providers (including “wireless ISPs”), terrestrial and satellite mobile wireless service providers, MMDS providers, electric utilities, municipalities, and other entities. (Such entities do not include equipment suppliers unless the equipment supplier uses the equipment to provision a broadband connection that it offers to the public for sale. Such entities also do not include providers of fixed wireless services ( e.g., “Wi-Fi” and other wireless ethernet, or wireless local area network, applications) that only enable local distribution and sharing of a premises broadband facility.) (2) Providers of Wired or Fixed Wireless Local Telephone Services: Incumbent and competitive LECs must complete and file the applicable portions of the form for each state in which they provide local exchange service to one or more end user customers (which may include “dial-up” ISPs). (3) Providers of Interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Service: Interconnected VoIP service is a service that enables real-time, two-way voice communications; requires a broadband connection from the user’s location; requires Internet-protocol compatible customer premises equipment; and permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the public switched telephone network and to terminate calls to the public switched telephone network. Interconnected VoIP providers must complete and file the applicable portions of the form for each state in which they provide interconnected VoIP service to one or more subscribers, with the state determined for reporting purposes by the location of the subscriber’s broadband connection or the subscriber’s “Registered Location” as of the data-collection date. “Registered Location” is the most recent information obtained by an interconnected VoIP service provider that identifies the physical location of an end user. (4) Providers of Mobile Telephony Services: Facilities-based providers of mobile telephony services must complete and file the applicable portions of this form for each state in which they serve one or more mobile telephony subscribers. A mobile telephony service is a real-time, two-way switched voice service that is interconnected with the public switched network using an in-network switching facility that enables the provider to reuse frequencies and accomplish seamless handoff of subscriber calls. A mobile telephony service provider is considered “facilities-based” if it serves a subscriber using spectrum for which the entity holds a license that it manages, or for which it has obtained the right to use via lease or other arrangement with a Band Manager.

SEPTEMBER 30: FCC FORM 396-C, MVPD EEO PROGRAM REPORTING FORM. Each year on September 30, multi-channel video program distributors (“MVPDs”) must file with the Commission an FCC Form 396-C, Multi-Channel Video Programming Distributor EEO Program Annual Report, for employment units with six or more full-time employees. Users must access the FCC’s electronic filing system via the Internet in order to submit the form; it will not be accepted if filed on paper unless accompanied by an appropriate request for waiver of the electronic filing requirement. Certain MVPDs also will be required to complete portions of the Supplemental Investigation Sheet (“SIS”) located at the end of the Form. These MVPDs are specifically identified in a Public Notice each year by the FCC.

Calendar At A Glance

Jul. 1 – FCC Form 481 (Carrier Annual Reporting Data Collection Form) is due.
Jul. 1 – FCC Form 690 (Mobility Fund Phase I Auction Winner Annual Report) is due.
Jul. 6 – Reply comments are due on the 9-1-1 Non-Service Initialized Device NPRM.
Jul. 6 – Reply comments are due on Eligible Services List for E-Rate 2016.
Jul. 9 – Deadline to Certify Accuracy of Authorization and Database Technical Information for Full Power and Class A Stations.
Jul. 9 – Deadline for Petitions for Eligible Entity Status for Full Power and Class A Stations.
Jul. 14 – Reply comments are due on the FCC’s Mobile Competition Report.
Jul. 16 – Comments are due on Part 4 Outage Reporting NPRM.
Jul. 20 – PRA comments are due on the Open Internet Order.
Jul. 27 – Comments are due on FirstNet Draft RFP.
Jul. 31 – Reply comments are due on Part 4 Outage Reporting NPRM.
Jul. 31 – FCC Form 507 (Universal Service Quarterly Line Count Update) is due.
Jul. 31 – Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Report is due.

Aug. 1 – FCC Form 502 due (North American Numbering Plan Utilization and Forecast Report).
Aug. 1 – FCC Form 499-Q (Quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet) is due.
Aug. 29 – Copyright Statement of Accounts is due.

Sep. 1 – FCC Form 477 due (Local Competition and Broadband Report).
Sep. 25 – Comments are due on Section IV.B of the Special Access Data NPRM.
Sep. 30 – FCC Form 396-C (MVPD EEO Program Annual Report).

BloostonLaw Private Users UpdateVol. 16, No. 26June 2015

FCC Imposes $24,000 in Fines for Harmful Interference and Tower Fencing Violations – Reiterates Definition of Willful and Repeated.

Acumen Communications

The Federal Communications Commission has imposed a $17,000 fine against Acumen Communications (Acumen) for operating on an unauthorized frequency and causing harmful interference to United States Coast Guard (USCG) operations.

In January 2013 and in response to a USCG complaint concerning harmful interference in the 150 MHz band, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau determined that a continuous signal was coming from Acumen’s transmitter at Mt. Wilson, California. The Enforcement Bureau was able to verify its determination by having Acumen shut down the suspect transmitter – which eliminated the harmful interference. The cause of the harmful interference was a spurious signal on 150.6973 MHz where the authorized signal was 152.285 MHz.

While Acumen did not deny that its transmitter was generating a spurious signal, Acumen asserted that the unauthorized frequency was created by a mix of various frequencies – including those that were not within its control. The FCC noted that the spurious frequency was within the range of spurious activity that Acumen acknowledged in its response to the underlying violation notice. Finally, the interference was eliminated when Acumen shut down its transmitter.

The FCC’s Rules require licensees to take reasonable precautions to avoid causing harmful interference, including monitoring the transmit frequency for communications that may already be in progress as well as any other reasonable measures that might be necessary to minimize the potential for harmful interference.

Finally, Acumen argued that it did not intend to cause harmful interference to USGS operations and that the Enforcement Bureau was required to demonstrate that Acumen intended to cause harmful interference. The FCC did not accept this argument.

Sound Communications

The FCC has imposed a $7,000 fine against Sound Communications, the licensee of an AM broadcast station, for failing to enclose its antenna structure within an effectively locked fence. The fencing requirement exists in order to prevent the public from entering areas with a high potential for exposure to radio frequency radiation (RF radiation). In this case, Sound Communications did not deny that its antenna structure was improperly enclosed. Rather, Sound Communications stated the FCC cannot impose the fine because its violation was neither willful nor repeated. In this regard, Sound Communications admitted that it left the gate unlocked to permit access to a tower crew, but did not re-lock the gate because it assumed that the crew would do so.

In imposing the fine, the FCC noted that Sound Communications admits to leaving the fencing gate unlocked for several days.

Willful and Repeated Acts

While Acumen’s and Sound Communications’ arguments are reasonable, the FCC has long taken a “strict liability” position that violations resulting from inadvertent errors or omissions often are willful violations. This is because the FCC has long concluded that the term “willful” does not require a finding that the licensee actually intended to commit a violation by engaging in a particular act. Rather, it is sufficient that the licensee merely knew it was committing the act, irrespective of any intent to violate the law. Thus, “it is not necessary that the violation be intentional. All that is necessary is that the licensee knew it was doing the act in question.” As a result, the FCC did not reduce or cancel the fines against Acumen or Sound Communications.

Enforcement Warning – The FCC Will Take Action Based Upon Information that Comes to its Attention

The FCC recently issued a letter to PayPal regarding changes to its User Agreement that would impact all of its users. The changes raised concerns that PayPal could violate federal laws governing the use of autodialed, prerecorded and artificial voice calls (including text messages). These changes came to the Enforcement Bureau’s attention through Media Reports and other sources. Thus, it is important to note that FCC personnel can and will take action based upon information that is in the public domain even if there have been no formal or informal complaint to trigger an investigation.

Those clients that are interested in utilizing prerecorded and artificial voice calls should contact our office so that we can assist in ensuring that your operation is compliant with federal law as well as the FCC rules and regulations.

WesTex’s Untimely Petition for Reconsideration Dismissed

In recent orders, the FCC has denied late-filed petitions for reconsideration, even where the merits of the claim might be valid. The Communications Act mandates that a petition for reconsideration must be filed within 30 days of the FCC’s action. The FCC has made clear that because the deadline is statutory, it does not have the discretion to accept a petition that is even one day late.

In the most recent case, WesTex Towers (WesTex) obtained a license for a private microwave station which had a construction deadline of February 13, 2015. On March 25, 2015, the FCC issued a public notice announcing its intent to terminate the license because WesTex had not filed the required construction notification. On May 31, 2015, more than 30 days after the filing deadline, WesTex filed its petition for reconsideration of the FCC’s action to place its private microwave license into a termination pending status.

FirstNet Declines to Take Position on FCC Timeline for Public Safety Transition from UHF T-Band

In response to an inquiry in connection with its draft Request for Proposal relating to construction of the public safety broadband network, FirstNet has announced that it does not anticipate taking a position on the issue of when and whether public safety entities must relocate their public safety radio systems from the UHF T-Band. This is significant because FirstNet is responsible for constructing an interoperable broadband public safety system in the 700 MHz band. The response is part of a FAQ appearing on FirstNet’s website relating to the RFP.

FCC Grants Waiver to Permit Use of Wrist-Worn Personal Locator Beacon

Breitling U.S.A. has obtained a waiver of Part 95 of the FCC’s Rules to permit equipment authorization and use of the Breitling Dual Band Emergency Watch (Emergency 2 Watch), which includes a Personal Locator Beacon (PLB). In particular, Breitling sought a waiver of certain manual control, battery and labelling requirements in the Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM) standard.

In 2001, the FCC granted Breitling a prior waiver to permit equipment authorization and use of its Emergency Watch, which was designed to be back-up safety device to supplement the conventional 121.5 MHz Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) radio beacon that is activated in order to alert search and rescue services in the event of an aviation accident. At the time, a waiver was required because the Emergency Watch did not meet all of the FCC’s technical requirements for ELTs, including certain battery, control and labeling requirements. Since the time that Breitling obtained its 2001 waiver, there have been ten emergency activations of the Emergency watch and no inadvertent or false alarms.

In 2002, the FCC amended its rules in order to permit the authorization and use of PLBs – emergency beacons for individuals on land that transmit on the frequencies 406.0-406.1 MHz and 121.5 MHz. PLBs must conform to the RTCM standards.

Breitling has now developed a second generation Emergency Watch that includes a PLB. Breitling claims that the incorporation of a PLB into a wristwatch casing as opposed to a conventional hand-held device renders certain requirements of the RTCM standards irrelevant or infeasible. To offset those issues, Breitling pointed out in its waiver request that the Emergency 2 Watch would be worn on the wrist and thus “immediately at hand and ready to operate with no added risk of harmful interference to others.” Additionally, Breitling noted that none of these issues would affect the reliable operation of the PLB and that the Emergency 2 Watch meets all of the other requirements of the RTCM standards (except for those provisions for which it was granted waiver back in 2001).

While the RTCM standard requires certain operational and battery life requirements, the Commission noted, in granting Breitling’s waiver request, that the Emergency 2 Watch was similar to a conventional PLB, but with the added benefit of being a wristwatch that is worn at all times as increasing the likelihood of it being available for use in an emergency situation. The Commission concluded that this ready access offset the operational differences between a conventional PLB and the Emergency 2 Watch.

FCC Adopts Rules for Robocalls and Text Messages

On June 18, the FCC adopted a Declaratory Ruling and Order in which it made a number of affirmations aimed at increasing consumer protection from robocalls and texts. The full text of the order is not yet available, but a press release issued by the FCC indicates the Order:

  • Permits service providers to offer robocall-blocking technologies to consumers and implement market-based solutions that consumers can use to stop unwanted robocalls.
  • Affirms the right of consumers to revoke their consent to receive robocalls and robotexts in any reasonable way at any time.
  • Creates a one-strike rule for reassigned numbers, requiring companies to stop calling a reassigned number after one call.
  • Clarifies that a consumer whose name is in the contacts list of an acquaintance’s phone does not consent to receive robocalls from third-party applications downloaded by the acquaintance.
  • Affirmed that consumers are entitled to the same consent-based protections for texts as they are for voice calls to wireless numbers.

The press release also indicates that the FCC adopted “very limited and specific exemptions for urgent circumstances,” such as free calls or texts to alert consumers to possible fraud on their bank accounts or remind them of important medication refills, among other financial alerts or healthcare messages, but provided that consumers have the right to opt out from these permitted calls and texts at any time.

Because the FCC’s modifications to the robocall restrictions are in the form of a declaratory ruling and order, many aspects may be effective immediately upon release of the document; therefore, our clients that utilize robocalling for a variety of legitimate reasons will want to evaluate their practices IMMEDIATELY under the new requirements, and make adjustments as necessary to avoid liability.

CTIA Sues City of Berkeley CA over RF Radiation Warning Requirement

CTIA, on behalf of the cellular industry, has sued the City of Berkeley, California in US District Court for Northern California to block an ordinance requiring the inclusion of an additional warning label with wireless handset sales. The warning rule includes a requirement that the service provider include the statement: “If you carry or use your phone in a pants or shirt pocket or tucked into a bra when the phone is ON and connected to a wireless network, you may exceed the federal guidelines for exposure to RF radiation. This potential risk is greater for children.” CTIA argues that the Berkeley warning is contrary to Federal studies finding no evidence linking cell phone use to cancer or other health issues, and that Berkeley is violating the free speech requirements of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Berkeley indicates that the ordinance merely recites information contained in the manufacturer’s product manuals.

The City of San Francisco had adopted a similar ordinance, only to revoke it in 2013 after CTIA took the city to court. But the San Francisco ordinance required the warning to disclose the emissions coming from the device. CTIA indicates in its court filing that the FCC’s standard already sets a protection standard well above what is necessary; and that consumer wireless devices meet the relevant standard regardless of how they are worn. The cellular industry is concerned that if the Berkeley ordinance stands, it will spawn a myriad of similar but different (and in some cases conflicting) requirements from other state and local governments, creating an unreasonable and expensive compliance burden on cellular providers and retailers.

FCC Amends Traveler’s Information Station Rules – Clarifies Weather Rebroadcast Restrictions

The Traveler’s Information Service (TIS) allows state and local governments to provide traveler’s aid information over low power radio transmitters operating in the AM radio band. Most often, these transmitters are located along interstate highway corridors and are designed to provide travelers with information concerning road conditions, travel restrictions and relevant weather forecasts as well as travel related emergency messages concerning natural disasters ( e.g., floods, forest fires, etc.), traffic accidents and other hazards that affect the safety of life and property.

FCC Clarifies Restriction on Weather Information

In 2013, the FCC amended its Traveler’s Information Service (TIS) Rules in order to allow public safety entities to provide highway traveler’s information more efficiently. At that time, the FCC clarified that permissible content broadcast had to be related to an emergency or an imminent threat of danger, or absent emergency conditions, provided “noncommercial voice information pertaining to traffic and road conditions, traffic hazard and travel advisories, directions, availability of lodging, rest tops and service stations, and descriptions of local points of interest.” TIS licensees were not, however, permitted to rebroadcast routine weather information.

In response to comments on this issue, the FCC has now clarified that while routine weather rebroadcasts are not permitted, TIS licensees may broadcast weather information (or retransmit NOAA broadcasts) “during times of hazardous or potentially hazardous conditions.” In so doing, the FCC noted that TIS licensees have “substantial discretion to determine what information is relevant to such conditions.” Additionally, the FCC noted that it has previously clarified that TIS licensees may broadcast emergency information and information related to imminent threats to safety of life or property even if the information is not travel related. Finally, the FCC recognized that TIS licensees are uniquely qualified to assess hazards in their local communities and are therefore in the best position to determine what information is relevant to a particular local emergency. As a result, the FCC believes that TIS licensees have the flexibility to broadcast necessary weather information during an emergency while still maintaining the primary purpose for the TIS system – namely to provide travel-related information.

Filtering Requirement

Part 90 of the FCC’s Rules currently requires TIS licensees to filter the transmit signal to 3 kHz in order to prevent interference to adjacent channel AM broadcast stations. As a result, this restriction has distinguished TIS stations from traditional AM broadcast stations, resulting in poorer audio fidelity which makes the TIS transmission less intelligible.
Based upon comments that it received, the FCC believes that this restriction is of negligible value and that the public would be better served by the wider bandwidth so that the motorists could receive travel related information from TIS stations that is clearer and easier to understand. As a result, the FCC is relaxing the filtering requirement from 3 kHz to 5 kHz, which it believes will result in audio quality similar to commercial AM broadcast stations while still preventing the potential for harmful interference to adjacent channel stations.

Equipment Certification

Any TIS licensee seeking to retrofit existing equipment, e.g., installation of an outboard 5 kHz filter at the audio input with deactivated 3 kHz filters, will require a Class II permissive change request. The FCC noted that equipment manufacturers should file a Class II permissive change request for each TIS model they seek to have retrofitted. The change request should describe the change and include a list of filters if more than one is to be approved with the system as well as clear and concise instructions for TIS licensees if the retrofit can be performed by the end-user licensee.

Before retrofitting any TIS equipment, TIS licensees must ensure that their equipment has received a Class II permissive change grant from the FCC and may only use approved filters for their particular system.

Music Content Prohibited on TIS Stations

Based upon complaints in the proceeding, the FCC reminds all TIS licensees that music may not be broadcast over TIS stations and that permitted communications are limited to voice communications. We caution that violations of this restriction could result in the imposition of monetary forfeitures by the FCC.

FCC Grants Petition to Deny Application for Modification of AMTS Station

The FCC received a petition to deny from Mission Broadcasting Inc. (Mission) to deny an application for modification of an Automated Maritime Telecommunications System (AMTS) license by Northwest Utilities Service Company (Northwest) to add a transmitter location for which individual licensing is required due to its proximity to television broadcast stations. The basis of the petition to deny was that that the proposed AMTS transmitter would cause significant interference to television reception. In its petition, Mission claimed that there are over 30,000 residences within both the proposed AMTS station’s predicted interference contour and the television stations noise limited service contour. Additionally, Mission noted that the AMTS station would cause harmful interference to television reception for 2,300 residences. Northwest claimed that while there were 4,200 residences within both the proposed AMTS stations predicted interference contour and the television station’s noise limited service contour, the proposed AMTS station would not cause interference to any of the affected residences.

Under the FCC’s Rules, AMTS stations are authorized on the condition that no harmful interference will be caused to the reception of existing television stations – particularly TV channels 10 and 13 due to their proximity to the AMTS spectrum. An applicant proposing to locate an AMTS transmitter within 80 miles of a channel 10 television station or 105 miles of a Channel 13 television station must provide an engineering study which demonstrates how it will avoid interference to television reception within the television stations Grade B contour. If there are more than 100 residences within both the proposed AMTS station’s predicted interference contour and the television stations Grade B contour, the AMTS applicant must (a) show that its proposed site is the only suitable location, (b) develop a plan to control any interference that is operations would cause within the Grade B contour and (c) agree to make any necessary adjustments to affected television receivers in order to eliminate the interference to television reception.

The FCC granted the petition and dismissed Northwest’s application as defective since there were more than 100 affected residences or households within both the proposed AMTS station’s predicted interference contour and the television station’s noise limited service contour and Northwest had not made the required showings.

In this case there was also a dispute as to whether Mission was under an obligation to identify an alternative site that could be used by Northwest. While the general requirement is yes, the FCC noted that the requirement was not triggered since Northwest failed to make a showing that its proposed site was the only suitable location. Office clients should be aware of this where similar issues might exist where an application is challenged on the basis of interference issues ( e.g., 72-76 MHz and developmental authorizations).

FCC Grants Waiver of 800 MHz Rules to Permit Commercial Licensing Before Expiration of the 5-Year Holding Period

The FCC received a waiver request from NexGen Communications Corporation for waiver of the five-year holding period for licensees to utilize 800 MHz Business/Industrial Land Transportation Service spectrum for commercial purposes. The FCC granted the waiver request with respect to one application, but not NexGen’s second application.

The five-year holding period was created as part of the 800 MHz rebanding process that was designed to resolve interference issues between commercial and public safety systems. This included the creation of the expansion band (which was designed for SMR stations) and the Guard Band (which was designated for public safety, business and SMR operations). Under the FCC’s procedures, the Expansion Band and Guard Band channels become available for licensing only after the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau announces that the required level of clearing has been achieved in the particular NPSPAC Region, and may not be used for commercial purposes until five years have elapsed.

In NexGen’s case, it applied for five Guard Band channels in Minneapolis and six Guard Band and Expansion Band Channels in New Berlin, Wisconsin. Both applications were granted in September 2013. Based upon these grants, NexGen purchased equipment and scheduled deployment of its New Berlin system for August 2014 in order to provide service to a large fleet user. Based upon an informal objection filed by Smartcomm in August 2014 which stated that the New Berlin application had been improperly coordinated since it was located in Waukesha County (Region 54 – Chicago) where rebanding had not yet been completed rather than Region 45. NexGen stated that it searched for alternative spectrum, but was unable to locate any and accordingly cancelled its New Berlin license in November 2014.

In December 2014, NexGen filed an application requesting three Business/Industrial Land Transportation frequencies at a second site in Minneapolis and a second application requesting one Business/Industrial Land Transportation channel at the New Berlin Site with a second channel at a location approximately 16 miles away in Milwaukee. Part 90 of the FCC’s Rules imposes a five year holding period before a licensee may convert the channels from private internal to commercial operation. NexGen has requested a waiver of the rule with respect to both of its pending applications.

In evaluating the waiver requests, the FCC concluded that NexGen presented a reasonable case with New Berlin/Milwaukee application since NexGen acted in reasonable reliance upon the FCC’s action to grant its initial New Berlin facilities application and the fact that the erroneous grant came to light almost a year later, after NexGen had purchased equipment and identified an initial customer. Having been unsuccessful in trying to locate alternative SMR frequencies, NexGen cancelled its initial New Berlin license. Inasmuch as NexGen had acted appropriately and relied on the FCC’s action in good faith, the FCC concluded that the circumstances warranted a waiver of the five-year holding period.

With respect to the Minneapolis application, the FCC concluded that a waiver was not justified and denied the request. In making this determination, the FCC noted that while a purpose of the rule is to prevent speculative trafficking of frequencies (which NexGen stated it would not be engaging in), the FCC also noted that the rule was also designed “to ensure that these channels will continue to be initially licensed only to entities that will use them for [private land mobile radio] communications” and that assigning these frequencies to NexGen or any other SMR provider would frustrate that purpose.

The FCC reiterated that it gives close scrutiny to 800 MHz applications and rule waiver requests in order to ensure that 800 MHz channels are only assigned to eligible users for the proper designated purpose. Here, NexGen demonstrated extraordinary circumstances with respect to its New Berlin application, but not with respect to its Minneapolis application.

City of Mesa, Arizona Obtains Extension of Time to Deploy 700 MHz Trunked Radio System

The City of Mesa, Arizona (Mesa) has sought an extension of time to complete the reprogramming of its six-channel, 700 MHz deployable trunked system. The system was licensed to Mesa in 2011, conditioned upon the outcome of a then pending rulemaking which explored whether to designate the 700 MHz reserve channels for deployable trunked systems.

On October 24, 2014, the Commission reallocated the reserve channels to General Use, subject to the Regional Planning Committee (RPC) coordination. In making this reallocation, the FCC gave the RPCs flexibility to designate up to eight of the former reserve channels for deployable trunked systems in non T-Band markets. Additionally, the FCC also encouraged the RPCs to amend their regional plans within six months of the publication of the report and order in the Federal Register (which was extended to October 30, 2015) and ordered Mesa, among other licensees, to reprogram their deployable trunked systems to the former reserve channels.

In requesting its extension, Mesa notes that it cannot submit an application for modification of license with the FCC until the Region 3 700 MHz RPC submits its frequency plan for FCC approval. As a result, Mesa has requested an extension of time for a period of six months following the Region 3 RPC’s adoption of a plan and the FCC’s approval of the Plan. Mesa states that a grant of the waiver will allow it to redeploy its system on the next maintenance cycle without having to incur additional expense in order to add the frequencies prior to the original June 2, 2015 deadline.

The FCC granted Mesa’s request because the Region 3 RPC has not yet amended its plan to identify the frequencies that may be used for deployable trunked systems and Mesa therefore cannot file its application since it does not know which frequencies will be approved for deployable trunked systems. Additionally, the FCC also noted that the public interest would be served because the extension would minimize the costs that would be incurred by Mesa.

It is important to note that the FCC does not routinely grant extension requests and that such requests are only considered in circumstances where the delay is due to reasons that are beyond the applicant’s control.

This newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice. Those interested in more information should contact the firm. For additional information, please contact Hal Mordkofsky at 202-828-5520 or .

Friends & Colleagues

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.

Complete Technical Services For The Communications and Electronics Industries Design • Installation • Maintenance • Training • Engineering • Licensing • Technical Assistance

black line

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
Registered Professional Engineer

Tel/Fax: 972-960-9336
Cell: 214-707-7711
7711 Scotia Dr.
Dallas, TX 75248-3112

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.

Consulting Alliance

Brad Dye, Ron Mercer, Allan Angus, Vic Jackson, and Ira Wiesenfeld are friends and colleagues who work both together and independently, on wireline and wireless communications projects.

Click here left arrow for a summary of their qualifications and experience. Each one has unique abilities. We would be happy to help you with a project, and maybe save you some time and money.

Note: We do not like Patent Trolls, i.e. “a person or company who enforces patent rights against accused infringers in an attempt to collect licensing fees, but does not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question.” We have helped some prominent law firms defend their clients against this annoyance, and would be happy to do some more of this same kind of work.

“If you would know the road ahead, ask someone who has traveled it.”
— Chinese Proverb

“He knows the water best who has waded through it.”
— Danish Proverb

Consulting Alliance

Wireless Network Planners

Wireless Network Planners
Wireless Specialists

R.H. (Ron) Mercer
217 First Street
East Northport, NY 11731

ron mercer
Telephone: 631-786-9359

Wireless Network Planners

Don't blink or you might miss the leap second on Tuesday

By The Associated Press
Jun. 30, 2015 1:40 PM EDT

This Tuesday, June 30, 2015 photo shows the second hand of a clock at the one second mark in New York. On Tuesday, international timekeepers are tacking a second to the clock to compensate for a slightly slower Earth rotation. The leap second means clocks will move from 11:59:59 p.m. universal time to the odd reading of 11:59:60 p.m. before it hits midnight. (AP Photo/Patrick Sison)

Tuesday lasts a wee bit longer — by a second.

International timekeepers are tacking a second to the clock to compensate for a slightly slower Earth rotation.

While a leap second is hardly enough time to change daily life, it has been known to affect some computer systems in the past.

There have been calls to abandon the practice of periodically adding an extra second, which has kept computers synchronized with the Earth day since 1972. The last time was in 2012.

A decision by a United Nations agency that deals with telecommunications issues isn't expected until later this year at the earliest.

For now, Tuesday's leap second means clocks will move from 23:59:59 to the odd reading of 23:59:60 before it hits midnight, universal time. That's 8 p.m. EDT.

[ Editor: I know, Tuesday has passed already, but what does this have to do with Paging and Wireless Messaging? A lot! GPS Time and Frequency reference signals are used to calibrate the radio infrastructure so that we can receive our messages uncorrupted.]

Source: AP The Big Story


From:Bill Woods
Subject: From The Wireless Messaging News
Date:June 26, 2015 at 11:38:16 AM CDT
To:Brad Dye

Good Morning Brad!

Since you used to work for Motorola, I thought you might know or might know someone who knows!

As I’m sure you know, in the Nucleus paging stations the SCM and the exciter are a “Matched Pair”.

I have several exciters and SCM’s that have become, for lack of a better thing to call it, un-matched.  As in I may have one of the pair but not the other.  I’ve read the alignment ID from each device and don’t have any matches.

Do you know how to  “re-match” the SCM and the exciter?  They are all working devices and since they are in short supply I’d hate for them to go to waste!

I appreciate any help you can be in figuring this out!  I’ve researched this for many hours and can’t find a solution!

Bill Woods
American Messaging
Network Operations – Northwest

Editor: You raise an interesting question. The “pair” (of hardware modules) were matched together in a laboratory-grade-calibration procedure in the factory, so I don’t think “fudging” a match through software would produce good on-the-air operation.

Do our readers have any input on this?

From:Jerry Griffith
Subject: From The Wireless Messaging News
Date:June 23, 2015 at 5:23:19 PM CDT
To:Brad Dye

Hello Brad!

Going thru some old memorabilia and thought you might enjoy this.

I spent many years working on/installing/maintaining Amcor, Commterm, Glen Day and BBL paging systems.

If you “Google” any of these, there is basically zero results. No-one has posted even one photo or comment on these paging systems that kept me busy for many years?  Hard to believe.

Well, here are several photos from my Amcor days. I regret that I have no photos of the BBL System III or even the Commterm voice storage that I attached to the old Amcor 2003A back in perhaps 1976??

Perhaps your readers might fill-in what I failed to document back in the 1970’s  and 1980’s.  I took an Amcor 2003A out of service in 1995, and replaced it with a Unipage 4-channel redundant M30 terminal. Yes, it still worked in 1994!


Amcor 1
Amcor 2
Amcor 3


The Wireless Messaging News

Current member or former member of these organizations.

Best regards,
brad's signature
Newsletter Editor
Licensed 57 years

Brad Dye
P.O. Box 266
Fairfield, IL 62837 USA

mensa member

If you are curious about why I joined Mensa, click here .

U.S. Navy

radioman second class
Second Class
Petty Officer



A Public Library of
animated gif
Paging Information


European Mobile Messaging Association
emma logo
Former Board Member

radio club paraguay
Radio Club
of Paraguay

Quarter Century qcwa k9iqy
Wireless Association

Back To Paging
Still The Most Reliable Wireless Protocol For Emergencies!

Skype: braddye
Twitter: @BradDye1
Telephone: +1-618-599-7869
Wireless: Consulting page
Paging: Home Page
Marketing & Engineering Papers
K9IQY: Ham Radio Page

Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers

wireless logo medium

Radio Club
radio club of america
of America

Life is good!

I am a person in
long-term recovery.


Independence Day

In the American holiday calendar no day is more significant than the Fourth of July, in which we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. That Declaration proclaimed to the world our separation from Great Britain and our emergence as a new sovereign nation, as we state in the pledge to our flag, “under God, with liberty and justice for all.”

Source: The New American


Home Page Directory Consulting Newsletters Products Reference Glossary Send e-mail