paging information resource

newsletter logo

Wireless News Aggregation

Friday — April 4, 2019 — Issue No. 850

Welcome Back To The Wireless Messaging News

5G Is A Big Deal

Just in case you haven't noticed 5G is one of the most important wireless developments in our lifetime. Please read the about some of the potential legal issues in the BloostonLaw section of this issue. More reports will be following in future issues.

ANOTHER GREAT ARTICLE THIS WEEK FROM REX LEE

“Step Big Brother” Corporate Surveillance Tech Giants Surveil & Data Mine Children For Profits: Google & Apple May Be Violating FTC Child Privacy Laws!

We need your help. This is probably the only remaining news source about paging and wireless messaging.

animated left arrow

Two contributions were received last week. Thank you very much.

 

Wireless Messaging News

  • Emergency Radio Communications
  • Wireless Messaging
  • Critical Messaging
  • Two-way Radio
  • Technology
  • Telemetry
  • Science
  • Paging
  • Wi-Fi
Wireless
wireless logo medium
Messaging

NO POLITICS HERE

This doesn't mean that nothing is ever published here that mentions a US political party—it just means that the editorial policy of this newsletter is to remain neutral on all political issues. We don't take sides.

About Us

A new issue of the Wireless Messaging Newsletter is posted on the web each week. A notification goes out by e-mail to subscribers on most Fridays around noon central US time. The notification message has a link to the actual newsletter on the web. That way it doesn’t fill up your incoming e-mail account.

There is no charge for subscription and there are no membership restrictions. Readers are a very select group of wireless industry professionals, and include the senior managers of many of the world’s major Paging and Wireless Messaging companies. There is an even mix of operations managers, marketing people, and engineers — so I try to include items of interest to all three groups. It’s all about staying up-to-date with business trends and technology.

We are having a cold spell in Southern, Illinois

I regularly get readers’ comments, so this newsletter has become a community forum for the Paging, and Wireless Messaging communities. You are welcome to contribute your ideas and opinions. Unless otherwise requested, all correspondence addressed to me is subject to publication in the newsletter and on my web site. I am very careful to protect the anonymity of those who request it.

TIME TO HUDDLE UP

Let's get together and share ideas. Our competitors are not other paging companies, they are other technologies.

I spend the whole week searching the INTERNET for news that I think may be of interest to you — so you won’t have to. This newsletter is an aggregator — a service that aggregates news from other news sources. You can help our community by sharing any interesting news that you find.

Editorial Policy

Editorial Opinion pieces present only the opinions of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any of advertisers or supporters. This newsletter is independent of any trade association. I don't intend to hurt anyone's feelings, but I do freely express my own opinions.

Prism-IPX Systems is growing and they are looking for more good software developers with communications experience. Additional information is available on their web site. Click here.

Service Monitors and Frequency Standards for Sale


Motorola Service Monitor

IFR Service Monitor

Efratom Rubidium Standard

(Images are typical units, not actual photos of items offered for sale here.)

Qty Item Notes
2 Late IFR 500As with new batteries
1 Motorola R 2001D  
4 Motorola R 2400 and 2410A  
5 Motorola R 2600 and R 2660 late S/Ns  
4 Motorola R 1200  
2 Motorola R 2200  
2 Stand-alone Efratom Rubidium Frequency Standards 10 MHz output
1 Telawave model 44 wattmeter Recently calibrated
1 IFR 1000S  
All sold with 7 day ROR (Right of Refusal), recent calibration, operation manual and accessories  
Factory carrying cases for each with calibration certificate  
Many parts and accessories  

 

Frank Moorman

fircls54@aol.com animated left arrow

(254) 596-1124

E-mail address has been corrected.

 

Subscribe Here

IT'S FREE

* required field

If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter just fill in the blanks in the form above, and then click on the “Subscribe” bar.

Advertiser Index

Easy Solutions  (Vaughan Bowden)
IWA Technical Services, Inc.  (Ira Wiesenfeld)
Leavitt Communications  (Phil Leavitt)
Prism Paging  (Jim Nelson & John Bishop)
Paging & Wireless Network Planners LLC  (Ron Mercer)
Wex International Limited

blue line

Leavitt Communications

blue line

leavitt

Specialists in sales and service of equipment from these leading manufacturers, as well as other two-way radio and paging products:

bendix king COM

motorola blue Motorola SOLUTIONS

   
UNICATION

WE ARE STILL STOCKING AND SELLING THE UNICATION ELEGANT PAGERS

Contact us for price and availability please

Philip C. Leavitt
Manager
Leavitt Communications
7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
CONTACT INFORMATION
E-mail: pcleavitt@leavittcom.com
Web Site: www.leavittcom.com
Mobile phone: 847-494-0000
Telephone: 847-955-0511
Fax: 270-447-1909
Skype ID: pcleavitt

My Other Job

Making Passive Smartphone Amplifiers That Don't Require Electricity.

Brass Horn — Wood Base

When I first saw these acoustic amplifiers for Smartphones I thought they were really cool, so I decided to make some of them for sale. I have been pleasantly surprised that people are buying them.

E-mail me for pricing.

Cornucopia

The most popular model — so far — has been one made from a Horn of Plenty hammered-brass planter that came from India — like this:

In stock at the The Owl’s Nest, 2006 Kelty Road, Franktown, Colorado 80116.

This brass gramophone (14 inches in diameter) was delivered from
India yesterday by FedEx. (04/04/19) It is going to be a
beautiful passive-smart-phone amplifier.

WEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Hong Kong
ONE SOURCE FOR ALL YOUR REQUIREMENTS OF PAGERS
FOR IN-HOUSE AND WIDE AREA NETWORK PAGING

POCSAG ALPHANUMERIC PAGERS TO SUIT EVERY REQUIREMENT

W8001 (4 Line/8 Line IP67 Alphanumeric Pager)

W8008 Thinnest IP67 Rated Alphanumeric Pager 4 Line/8 Line, OLED Display

W2028 (2 Line/4 Line Alphanumeric Pager)

For Trade inquiries contact:
Eric Dilip Kumar
eric@wex.com.hk

  • Available in VHF, UHF & 900 MHz Full Range Frequency Bands
  • We are OEM for Major Brand names in USA and Europe
  • We also Design and Manufacture POCSAG Decoder Boards
  • We can Design and Manufacture to customer specifications
  • Factory located in Shenzhen, China
  • Pagers have FCC, RoHs, C-Tick, CE-EMC, IC Approvals

Visit our websites for more details www.wex.com.hk

For ESPAÑOL, PORTUGUÊS AND DEUTSCH versions, please go to:
www.pagermaker.com

A Rogues’ Gallery of Robocallers

The FTC and FCC regularly crack down on scammers. Here are some of their recent catches.

By Consumer Reports
April 02, 2019

The Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission regularly bring actions against robocallers and Do Not Call violators in civil court, often with help from state authorities. Since 2003 the agencies have won more than $1.5 billion in penalties and restitution.

But only a small fraction of the money has been recovered, says Maureen Mahoney, policy analyst at Consumer Reports, because the culprits are difficult to track or the profits are spent.

Here are some of the FTC and FCC’s recent catches.

Malicious Spoofer: Adrian Abramovich

The pitch: The telemarketer pushed travel deals said to be from national brands, such as Marriott and TripAdvisor, only to switch the consumers to call centers that would try to sell Mexican timeshare packages, according to the FCC.

The scope of the scheme: The FCC found that the company spoofed more than 96 million robocalls in just three months. A medical paging company reported that the robocallers were disrupting its service, according to the FCC.

The judgment: The FCC imposed a $120 million penalty in 2018.

Credit Card Con Artists: All Us Marketing

The pitch: A web of companies and individuals, formerly operating under the name Payless Solutions, made illegal robocalls pitching a program to lower credit card interest rates.

The scope of the scheme: The 18 defendants phoned thousands of consumers, including many seniors, claiming they would save at least $2,500 in credit card interest payments with the rate-reduction program. The consumers paid $300 to $4,999 up front but received no rate reductions, according to the FTC and the Florida state attorney general.

The judgment: In 2017 a court imposed a judgment of $4.9 million on the 12 defendants alleged to be most responsible for the scam. Smaller judgments were imposed on three other defendants. For most, the judgment was entirely or partially suspended based on inability to pay.

Relentless Robocaller: Justin Ramsey

The pitch: Led companies that blasted out millions of robocalls, often to consumers on the Do Not Call Registry, according to the FTC, offering home security systems and other products.

The scope of the scheme: Despite an ongoing investigation by the FTC, allegedly continued unlawful telemarketing through a new firm, making more than 800,000 calls to DNC numbers.

The judgment: Ordered to pay $2.2 million in 2017 to the FTC, suspended upon payment of $65,000, based on inability to pay. Banned from placing robocalls, as well as calling and selling lists of DNC numbers.

Insurance Telemarketer: Philip Roesel

The pitch: Marketed health insurance allegedly by targeting vulnerable consumers, including the elderly, the infirm, and low-income people, according to the FCC.

The scope of the scheme: Using spoofed caller ID numbers, the FCC found that the company made more than 21.5 million robocalls in three months, averaging 200,000 per day.

The judgment: In 2018 the FCC imposed a forfeiture of $82 million on Roesel and his company.

California Scheming: Aaron Michael Jones

The pitch: A nine-person operation in California led by Jones engineered billions of illegal robocalls, offering extended auto warranties or search engine optimization services, according to the FTC. The operation also generated leads for other companies selling those goods and services, among others.

The scope of the scheme: The operation called phone numbers, including those on the DNC registry, at a rate of more than 100 million per year.

The judgment: Jones was ordered to pay $2.7 million to the FTC. He and the other defendants were banned from robocalling and abusive telemarketing activities; penalties totalling $9.9 million were imposed on the others, with all but $510,000 suspended because of inability to pay.

Robocall Ringleader: Kevin Guice

The pitch: Ran two telemarketing companies and 11 shell companies from a boiler room in Florida. Offered a credit card debt elimination service, charging between $2,500 and almost $26,000 up front.

The scope of the scheme: Raked in more than $23 million from more than 10,000 consumers, according to the FTC.

The judgment: Ordered to pay $23 million by a Florida federal court in 2018 for damages and restitution to defrauded consumers. Required to surrender personal property, including a 55-foot yacht, to a court-appointed receiver.

Tricky Travel Deals: Caribbean Cruise Line

The pitch: Hired a company that ran an allegedly illegal telemarketing campaign that promised consumers a free two-day Bahamas cruise if they answered a political survey. The calls were designed to push more costly products and services to customers, generating millions of dollars, according to the FTC.

The scope of the scheme: The operation made billions of robocalls that relied on ID spoofing, disguising the names that would appear on caller IDs, according to the FTC.

The judgment: Caribbean was fined $7.73 million in 2015, partially suspended after payment of $500,000. With other defendants, was banned from making robocalls and engaging in abusive telemarketing practices.

Editor's Note: This article also appeared in the May 2019 issue of Consumer Reports magazine.

Source: Consumer Reports  

Paging Transmitters 150/900 MHz

The RFI High Performance Paging Transmitter is designed for use in campus, city, state and country-wide paging systems. Designed for use where reliable simulcast systems where RF signal overlap coverage is critical.

  • Commercial Paging systems.
  • Healthcare Paging systems.
  • Public Safety Emergency Services Paging systems.
  • Demand Response Energy Grid Management.

Built-in custom interface for Prism-IPX ipBSC Base Controller for remote control, management and alarm reporting.

  • Use as a stand-alone unit or in wide area network.
  • Mix with other transmitter brands in an existing paging network.
  • Adjustable from 20-250 watts.
  • 110/240 VAC or 48VDC.
  • Absolute Delay Correction.
  • Remote Diagnostics.
  • Configurable alarm thresholds.
  • Integrated Isolator.
  • Superb Reliability.
  • Improved amplifier efficiency.
  • Most reliable high-powered paging transmitter available.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 Email: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com

Back To Paging

pagerman

Still The Most Reliable Protocol For Wireless Messaging!

Newsletter Advertising

look

If you are reading this, your potential customers are reading it as well. Please click here to find out about our advertising options.


Licensed Adobe Stock Image

Easy Solutions

easy solutions

Providing Expert Support and Service Contracts for all Glenayre Paging Systems.

The GL3000 is the most prolific paging system in the world and Easy Solutions gladly welcomes you to join us in providing reliable support to the paging industry for many more decades in the future.

Easy Solutions provides cost effective computer and wireless solutions at affordable prices. We can help in most any situation with your communications systems. We have many years of experience and a vast network of resources to support the industry, your system and an ever changing completive landscape.

  • We treat our customers like family. We don’t just fix problems . . . We recommend and implement better cost-effective solutions.
  • We are not just another vendor . . . We are a part of your team. All the advantages of high priced full-time employment without the cost.
  • We are not in the Technical Services business . . . We are in the Customer Satisfaction business.

Experts in Paging Infrastructure

  • Glenayre, Motorola, Unipage, etc.
  • Excellent Service Contracts
  • Full Service—Beyond Factory Support
  • Making systems More Reliable and MORE PROFITABLE for over 30 years.

Please see our web site for exciting solutions designed specifically for the Wireless Industry. We also maintain a diagnostic lab and provide important repair and replacement parts services for Motorola and Glenayre equipment. Call or  e-mail  us for more information.

Easy Solutions
3220 San Simeon Way
Plano, Texas 75023

Vaughan Bowden
Telephone: 972-898-1119
Telephone: 214 785-8255
Website: www.EasySolutions4You.com
E-mail: vaughan@easysolutions4you.com

Easy Solutions

IMPORTANT

“Is Paging Going Away?” by Jim Nelson

  • Click here for English.
  • Click here for German. (Berlin Revision: November 8, 2016)
  • Click here for French.

Here is an English PDF edit of this paper formatted with page breaks and suitable for printing.

Volunteers needed for translations into other languages.

GLENAYRE INFRASTRUCTURE

I would like to recommend Easy Solutions for Support of all Glenayre Paging Equipment. This Texas company is owned and operated by Vaughan Bowden. I have known Vaughan for over 35 years. Without going into a long list of his experience and qualifications, let me just say that he was the V.P. of Engineering at PageNet which was—at that time—the largest paging company in the world. So Vaughan knows Paging.

GTES is no longer offering support contracts. GTES was the original group from Vancouver that was setup to offer support to customers that wanted to continue with the legacy Glenayre support. Many U.S. customers chose not to use this service because of the price and the original requirement to upgrade to version 8.0 software (which required expensive hardware upgrades, etc.). Most contracts ended as of February 2018.

If you are at all concerned about future support of Glenayre products, especially the “king of the hill” the GL3000 paging control terminal, I encourage you to talk to Vaughan about a service contract and please tell him about my recommendation.

SUBSCRIBE HERE

Board of Advisors

The Wireless Messaging News
Board of Advisors

Frank McNeill
Founder & CEO
Communications Specialists
Jim Nelson
President & CEO
Prism Systems International
Kevin D. McFarland, MSCIS
Sr. Application Systems Analyst
Dartmouth-Hitchcock
Medical Center
Paul Lauttamus, President
Lauttamus Communications & Security
R.H. (Ron) Mercer
Wireless Consultant
Barry Kanne
Paging Industry Veteran
Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
Allan Angus
Consulting Engineer

The Board of Advisor members are people with whom I have developed a special rapport, and have met personally. They are not obligated to support the newsletter in any way, except with advice, and maybe an occasional letter to the editor.

CAN YOU HELP?

Can You Help The Newsletter?

animated left arrow

You can help support The Wireless Messaging News by clicking on the PayPal Donate button above. It is not necessary to be a member of PayPal to use this service.

Reader Support

Newspapers generally cost 75¢ $1.50 a copy and they hardly ever mention paging or wireless messaging, unless in a negative way. If you receive some benefit from this publication maybe you would like to help support it financially?

A donation of $50.00 would certainly help cover a one-year period. If you are wiling and able, please click on the PayPal Donate button above.

“Step Big Brother — Corporate Surveillance

Tech Giants Surveil & Data Mine Children For Profits: Google & Apple May Be Violating FTC Child Privacy Laws!

By Rex M. Lee

My daughter brought to my attention that the high school she attends forces the students to use intrusive Google apps plus Gmail (Google) which could be considered “forced participation” regarding predatory surveillance and data mining business practices employed by Google.

My daughter expressed concern that schools are enabling Google to data mine students via Gmail plus Google student-centric apps such as Google Classroom, Google Docs and Google Family Link for Parents.

All of these Google student related apps are distributed through Google Play plus the Apple App Store (Google Classroom).

I decided to do a deep dive on the app permissions that support Google Classroom, Google Docs, Google Family Link for Parents and the Gmail app that supports Gmail.

As I’ve been reporting for The Epoch Times, apps that support smartphones, tablet PCs and connected products are nothing more than legal malware that enables the app developer to monitor, track, and data mine the product user for financial gain even at the expense of the user’s privacy and safety.

Regarding the predatory surveillance and data mining business practices employed by Google, it is no surprise that the Google student-centric apps are in fact malware that enables Google to surveil and data mine the product user for financial gain which includes teachers, teens, and children.

This is no surprise since Google’s business model is based on Surveillance Capitalism which many parents and educators need to understand. 

What is surprising is the fact that school districts nation-wide are adopting intrusive technology such as Google apps enabling companies such as Google to surveil and data mine students that could include children under the age of 13 which could be a violation of child privacy laws.

Surveilling and data mining children for financial gain under the age of 18 is bad enough much less children under the age of 13 which could be a violation of the FTC Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA”). 

Understanding Surveillance Capitalism 101

Before we examine COPAA compliance to see if tech giants such as Apple and Google may be violating FTC COPAA compliance, let’s review the app permissions that support Google Classroom, Google Docs, and Gmail which students at my daughter’s high school are being forced to use without parental consent.

Google Classroom, Google Docs, & Gmail App Permissions- Distributed by Google Play and the Apple App Store (Google Classroom)

The Google Classroom App is marketed to students and teaches as a way to connect the student and the teacher to support activities such assignments and homework.  Below is the actual description of how the app works from Google Play:

  • “Classroom is a free service for schools, non-profits, and anyone with a personal Google account. Classroom makes it easy for learners and instructors to connect—inside and outside of schools. Classroom saves time and paper, and makes it easy to create classes, distribute assignments, communicate, and stay organized.”

Like Google Docs and Gmail, Google Class Room is another free application that provides convenience but is the app really free?

Is Google a non-profit company that spends millions on R&D to develop “Free Stuff” that they give away to the public?

Of course Google is not a non-profit.  Google loves profits especially when it comes to surveilling and data mining their product users for financial gain after all Google’s intrusive business plan is based on Surveillance Capitalism which means that companies such as Google monetize their product users such as you.

Like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Facebook, Google views their product users as uncompensated information producers whom are to be exploited for profits at the expense of the user’s privacy whether the user is an adult, teen, or child or in this case a teacher or student.

By way of the Google student-centric apps, Google is enabled to collect a lot of valuable sensitive user data known as a person’s digital DNA which is the most valuable commodity on earth. 

Why do you think that Google and Apple are some of the most valuable corporations on earth?  Is it because they give away “Free Stuff”?

No of course not, these companies have become some of the most valuable companies on earth by profiting off of the use of their operating system (“OS”) product user’s personal and professional digital DNA which includes surveillance data (e.g. location data) and sensitive user data.

Understanding Intrusive and Exploitive Apps 101

Now that you understand Surveillance Capitalism let’s understand how intrusive and exploitive apps work.

Exactly how much personal and professional digital DNA does the student-centric Apps enable Google to collect, use, share, sell, and aggregate for financial gain?

The Answer: “A lot according to my analysis of the app permissions associated with each student-centric app.” 

The collective student-centric android apps are granted many intrusive application permissions per app enabling Google to collect highly confidential personal and professional digital DNA from the student and teacher who uses these apps.

I will highlight only a few of the app permissions associated with Google Classroom, Google Docs, and Gmail plus other android app permissions that are relevant to the use of android apps in general:

  • Identity This gives Google access to Accounts set up on the device which would include smartphones, tablet PCs and other connected products that support the app including PCs. 

Access to accounts means that Google can collect information on any account set up on the device such as banking, medical, social media, personal accounts and other highly confidential account information.

Don’t take my word for this claim, read a few of the android application permissions associated with access to accounts, social media accounts, contacts and user identity of which these types of permissions are associated with apps such as Google Class Room App, Google Docs, and Gmail (App):

Android Account Application Permission Statement“Allows the app to get the list of accounts known by the phone.  This may include any accounts created by application you have installed.  This means non-Google applications as well.”

  • Android Social Media Account Application Permission Statement & Product Warning.  “Allows the app to access and sync social updates from you and your friends.  Be careful when sharing information — this allows the app to read communications between you and your friends on social networks, regardless of confidentiality. . .”

Regarding the collection of messages from social media apps, note that the android social media app permission is an example of how much information Google can collect from a social media account even social media accounts that are not associated with Google products such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and other accounts. 

The amount of personal and professional information Google can collect from an account set up on the device is astonishing and concerning to say the least.

Potential Violation of Medical Information Laws (HIPAA).  Parents need to consider that teens and children may have apps associated with their healthcare providers on their smartphone of which are considered accounts.  This means that Google and other app developers can access medical accounts by way of preinstalled and third-party apps such as Google Classroom.

  • Android Contacts (Electronic Address Book) App Permission Statement & Product Warning.  “Allows the app to read data about your contacts stored on your phone, including the frequency with which you’ve called, emailed, or communicated in other ways with specific individuals.  This permission allows apps to save your contact data, and malicious apps may share contact data without your knowledge.”

The contacts application permission not only allows Google to collect the user’s electronic contact address book but also enables Google to surveil the app user by tracking how the student communicates with their family, friends, teachers and others by phone, email and other ways such as text messaging or instant messaging.

Violation of Consumer Laws Governed by the FTC and State AGs- Hidden Product Warnings.  Like the android social media account application permission statement, the contacts app permission statement also contains a product warning that is hidden from the app user which I believe is illegal according to existing consumer laws governed by the FTC and state AGs which should be concerning to parents and educators.

“Should adults, teens, children, students and teachers be using intrusive and exploitive apps that are supported by hidden application product warnings?”

Deceptive Trade Practices- Illegal Terms of Use.  Educators and parents should be highly concerned in regards to intrusive and exploitive apps that are supported by hidden application product warnings that are not published online within T&Cs, privacy policies or end user licensing agreements (“EULAs”). 

Hiding application legalese and app product warnings I believe is illegal according to existing consumer laws.

It is clear that Google, Apple, and Microsoft are taking advantage of the fact that parents, students, and educators do not understand the terms of use that support intrusive and exploitive apps such as Google Classroom.

  • Android Personal App Permission Statement- App Developers can Identify App Users! “Allows apps to read personal profile information stored on your device, such as your name and contact information.  This means apps can identify you and may send your profile information to others.”

Deceptive Trade Practices- Personal Identity. Like other people who are under the impression their identifiable personal information associated with products such as smartphones and table PCs is protected by companies such as Google, you have been deceived as the android personal information app permission confirms.

Regarding the Facebook and Google congressional hearings in 2018, Mark Zuckerberg, Chairman/CEO of Facebook and Sundar Pichia say that Facebook and Google do not sell or share identifiable personal information to third-parties such as data brokers like Cambridge Analytica. 

However the hidden android application permission statement above confirms that app developers such as Google and Apple can identify the app user plus forward the user’s identity and contact information to “Others”.

“Others” sounds like third-parties to me.  Educators, Parents, and Students should be highly concerned that apps enable app developers to identify the app user which includes children under the age of 18 and 13 which would be a violation of FTC COPAA compliance (see enclosed info for details).

Harmful Use of a Child or Student’s Personal Information (“digital DNA”)

Telecom providers such as AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint were in the news recently regarding the sale of their paying customer’s location data to data brokers such as Zumiga and Locationsmart* who used the information in a harmful manner.
* Source: Business Insider - June 2018

Over the past two years there have been numerous reports of abuse, negligent, and harmful use of personal and professional information by tech giants that include Google, Apple, Facebook and other tech giants.

For example**, some of the reports include the Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal, Apps share personal info with Facebook and Google forgetting to tell Nest customers that secret microphones are embedded in their products, and the list goes on.
**Source: The Wall street Journal - Feb 22nd, 2019

After numerous examples of abuse, negligent, and harmful use of personal and professional information, where is the FTC and state AGs when it comes to enforcing existing consumer laws?

The question that the FTC, state AGs, law makers, parents, and educators need to ask at this point is:

”Is Google using student and child personal information acquired from apps such as Google Classroom in a manner that can bring harm to the child or teacher?”

People tell me all of the time, “I’m not a terrorist or breaking the law so I don’t care if Google is surveilling and tracking every aspect of my personal and professional life.”  

This is the worst statement regarding a person’s privacy of all time.

Per the telecom Zumiga/Locationsmart and Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandals, companies such as Google sell access to their product users to data brokers such as Aleksandra Kogan.

Mr. Kogan developed an innocent looking Facebook survey app that enabled him to surveil and data mine millions of Facebook users for financial gain and then sold the Facebook user’s personal and professional digital DNA to Cambridge Analytica who exploited the user data for financial gain at the expense of the user’s privacy and safety. 

This means that personal and professional digital DNA acquired by apps such as Google Classroom could end up in the hands of data brokers, employers, state actors, institutions of higher learning, law enforcement, insurance and bank underwriters, and other entities that could bring harm to the user such as student or teacher.

Google Exposes Children to Child Predators.***  Another example of online harm by way of an app is the recent story regarding the fact that YouTube continually poses harm to their users including children such as the case involving child predators who engage children who are viewing content from companies such as Disney.
*** Source: The Verge — February 19th, 2019

Addictive, Intrusive, Exploitive and Harmful Apps Disguised as Social Media and Gaming Apps

As I’ve reported several times, Sean Parker, Co-founder of Facebook and Tristan Harris, former product designer for Google have publicly admitted that Facebook and Google intentionally develop addictive platforms, apps and technology in order to exploit their product users for financial gain even at the expense of the user’s privacy and safety whether the user is an adult, teen, or child.

Don’t take my word of this claim, Mr. Parker explains it better than I can per an Axios interview from 2017:

  • Sean Parker (Co-Founder Facebook & Spotify): a) "It's a social-validation feedback loop ... exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you're exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology. . . God only knows what it's doing to our children's brains. . . The inventors, creators — it's me, it's Mark [Zuckerberg], it's Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it's all of these peopleunderstood this consciously. And we did it anyway. . .” — Sean Parker, Axios- November 9th, 2017.

At this point we need to ask the question:  “How come the FTC, state AGs and law makers are not protecting the public from addictive, intrusive, exploitive and harmful technology?”

The answer:  major media news organizations plus the FTC, state AGs, and law makers have turned a blind eye to these types of public admissions made by senior executives and product designers for Facebook and Google. Why?

How Laws are Written in Washington D.C. 101Erich Schmidt, former chairman Alphabet Inc. (Google), explains how telecom and tech giants have invested millions into lobbying efforts that have resulted in the reason why the FTC, FCC, state AGs and law makers may have turned a blind eye to incriminating admissions made by Mr. Parker and Mr. Harris:

  • "The average American doesn't realize how much of the laws are written by lobbyists" to protect incumbent interests. . . It's shocking how the system actually works. . . Washington is an incumbent protection machine.” ****

I did not learn this in my high school civics classes.
**** Source: The Atlantic, October 2010

Now that we understand that companies such as Facebook and Google write consumer laws associated with privacy plus addictive, intrusive, exploitive, and harmful technology, we can now understand why agencies such as the FTC, FCC plus state AGs and law makers are not protecting us. 

Aside from Google and Facebook addictive and harmful apps, parents and educators need to be concerned with third-party apps such as Pokémon Go which I also believe are not complaint with FTC COPAA.

To understand why, all you have to do is view the android and Apple app permissions associated with the Pokémon Go app to realize how intrusive, exploitive, and potentially harmful this app is.

The Pokémon Go app permissions explain how much surveillance data and personal information the app developer, Niantic (former Google Company), is enabled to collect from teens and children who use the app and platform.

Below are some of the intrusive and exploitive app permissions granted to Niantic by Google:

  • Access to Hardware such as the Camera.  This enables Niantic to conduct audio and visual surveillance on the teen and child’s activities 24x7 365 days a year even when the teen or child is not using the app.
    • Android Camera App Permission: “Allows the App to Take Pictures and Video with the Camera.  This permission allows the app to use the camera at any time without your confirmation.”  This means without parental consent which could be a violation of FTC COPAA compliance (see enclosed information).
  • Access to Location Data and Physical Activity.  Google is enabling Niantic to conduct surveillance on the teen and child’s activities 24x7 365 days a year plus monitor when the teen or child is sitting, walking, running, cycling or even when riding in a car.

Android Location Data, Physical Activity App Permissions & Auto Telematics: “Allows the app to get your precise location using the Global Positioning System (GPS) or network location sources such as cell towers and Wi-Fi. . . Apps may use this to determine where you are. . . Allows the app to receive periodic up-dates of your activity level from Google, for example, if you are walking, driving, cycling or stationary. . . Access your car’s speed.”

Another question to ask?: “What parent would knowingly allow complete strangers to conduct audio, video and physical surveillance on their children, 24x7 365 days a year?”

Google is enabling Niantic to indiscriminately monitor, track and data mine the app user, which includes teens and children 24x7 365 days a year whether or not the teen or child is using the Pokémon Go app or on the platform.

Like Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple, the Pokémon Go app user does not have to be actively using the apps or be on the platforms associated with the apps in order Niantic to monitor, track, and data mine the app user for financial gain.

In addition, Google is enabling Niantic to collect personal information from the teen and child that has nothing to do with the use of the Pokémon Go app or platform.

For example, Niantic is enabled by Google to collect the user’s contacts, audio and video of the user’s activities, physical activity data and location data associated with the user’s activities even when the teen or child is not using the app or on the platform.

Violation of COPAA Compliance- Child Surveillance and Data Mining for Profits

To collect personal information from a child 13 and under, a company such as Google must receive parental consent according to FTC COPPA ******:

  • When do I have to get verifiable parental consent?  The Rule provides generally that an operator must obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting any personal information from a child, unless the collection fits into one of the Rule’s exceptions described in various FAQs herein.  See 16 C.F.R. § 312.5(c).

****** Source: FTC COPAA

One would have to ask at this point:  “Are companies such as Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, Niantic and other tech giants getting lawful consent from parents regarding predatory surveillance and data mining business practices?”

I think not.  The exceptions to this rule are too deep to list in this article but I can tell you that I believe companies such as Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon and other tech giants are not in compliance regarding FTC COPAA regarding a number of issues I’ve documented in this article.

To find out more, I suggest parents and educators visit the FTC COPAA website:
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule

The FTC and state AGs need to start enforcing existing consumer laws that protect adults, teens, and children from companies that employ predatory and harmful surveillance & data mining business practices.

Tips on Protecting Your Child’s Personal Digital DNA

It is a fact of life that children will need to use smartphones, tablet PCs, and connected products supported by the android OS, Apple iOS, and Microsoft Windows OS.

Last question:  “What can parents do to protect their child’s privacy and personal information (digital DNA)?”

Enclosed below are a few tips for protecting your child’s digital DNA:

  1. Keep your “digital DNA” clean.  I tell my kids to not do anything online or on smartphone, table PC or connected product via an app that they will regret or could cause embarrassment.
  2. Audit your child’s use.  Don’t be afraid to conduct a usage and app audit with your children present.  Let them know you are not invading their privacy but helping to protect them from harm.
  3. Communicate and collaborate with other parents, educators, & children.  It is important as a society we discuss privacy topics that include predatory surveillance and data mining business practices employed by Google, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and other tech giants.
  4. Ask questions.  Contact your telecom service provider and ask them why they are selling smartphones, tablet PCs and connected products that are supported by addictive, intrusive, exploitive and harmful technology such as apps.
    • Discuss child privacy and safety concerns with your telecom providers. 
    • Again, why is AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, and Sprint exposing their paying customers to companies that employ predatory surveillance and data mining business practices?
  5. Read the Terms of Use.  Don’t click on “I Agree” without reading the terms of use.  Convenience is not worth the value of your privacy plus personal and professional Digital DNA.
  6. Take Action. File complaints with your service providers as well as government agencies such as the FTC & FCC:
  1. Find Resources that Provide Information Regarding Intrusive and Harmful Tech.  Check out Tristian Harris’s site, Time Well Spent: http://www.timewellspent.io/  Take his and my advice to unplug from time to time. 
    • Here is a novel idea, play an unconnected game of monopoly with your children in the privacy of your home. 
    • Just make sure all smartphones, tablet PCs and other connected devices are put into safe and are buried in the backyard before you play the game.

Hopefully the FTC, FCC, state AGs and law makers will finally stop turning a blind eye and start protecting citizens, teens, and children from companies that employ predatory and harmful surveillance & data mining business practices rooted in Surveillance Capitalism.

Rex M. Lee is a privacy and data security consultant and Blackops Partners senior analyst and researcher.  For more information go to www.MySmartPrivacy.com  Plus follow Rex on Twitter @RexMLee1

Source: Rex M. Lee  

Voluntary Newsletter Supporters By Donation

Kansas City

mobilfone

Premium Newsletter Supporter

gcs logo

Premium Newsletter Supporter

Canyon Ridge Communications

canyon ridge

Premium Newsletter Supporter

ProPage Inc.

propage

Newsletter Supporter

Metropolitan Communications

Metropolitan

Newsletter Supporter

e*Message Wireless Information Services Europe

Newsletter Supporter

Lekkerkerk, Netherlands

Newsletter Supporter

 

 

 

Donate to have your company's logo added.

Incyte Capital Holdings LLC
Dallas, Texas

Premium Newsletter Supporter

Le Réseau Mobilité Plus
Montreal, Quebec

reseau

Newsletter Supporter

Communication Specialists

communication specialists

Newsletter Supporter

Cook Paging

cook paging

Premium Newsletter Supporter

MethodLink

methodlink

Premium Newsletter Supporter

Citipage Ltd.
Edmonton, Alberta

citipage

Newsletter Supporter

Click on the image above for more info about advertising here.

blue line

Prism-IPX Systems

 

prism-ipx systems
Critical Messaging that works
Secure . . . Dependable . . .
and Encrypted

Who We Are

Prism-IPX is a leader in providing reliable communications systems using modern designs to meet today’s demands for critical message alerting and delivery. Prism-IPX designs versatile and robust Critical Message Management systems using paging and other wireless technologies for high performance and dependable communications.

What We Make

Prism-IPX Systems products include full-featured radio paging systems with VoIP input, IP based transmitter control systems and paging message encryption. Other options include e-mail messaging, remote switch controllers, Off-The-Air paging message decoders and logging systems.

Contact Us   left arrow

blue line

Click on the image above for more info about advertising here.

INTERNET Protocol Terminal

The IPT accepts INTERNET or serial messaging using various protocols and can easily convert them to different protocols, or send them out as paging messages.

An ideal platform for hospitals, on-site paging applications, or converting legacy systems to modern protocols.

Input Protocols: Serial and IP
TAP TNPP SNPP
HTTP WCTP SMTP
POTS (DTMF) DID (DTMF)  
 
Output Protocols: Serial and IP
TAP TNPP SNPP
HTTP HTTPS SMPP
WCTP WCTPS SMTP
FLEX (optional PURC control)   POCSAG (optional PURC control)

Additional/Optional Features

  • Database of up to 5000 subscribers.
  • 4 serial ports on board.
  • Up to 8 phone lines (DID or POTS).
  • Can be configured for auto-fail-over to hot swap standby.
  • 1RU rack mount unit appliance—no moving parts.
  • Easily secure legacy system messages leaving site for HIPAA compliance.
  • Only purchase the protocols/options you need.
  • Add Paging Encryption for HIPAA compliance on site.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com

blue line

Paging Data Receiver PDR-4

The PDR-4 is a multi-function paging data receiver that decodes paging messages and outputs them via the serial port, USB or Ethernet connectors.

Designed for use with Prism-IPX ECHO software Message Logging Software to receive messages and log the information for proof of transmission over the air, and if the data was error free.

  • Option—decode capcode list or all messages.
  • Large capcode capacity.
  • Serial, USB and Ethernet output.
  • POCSAG or FLEX page decoding, special SA protocols.
  • Receivers for paging bands in VHF, UHF, 900 MHz.
  • Message activated Alarm Output.
  • 8 programmable relay outputs.
  • Send notifications of a system problem.
  • Synthesized Receiver Tuning.
  • Selectivity better than 60 dB.
  • Frequencies 148-174, 450-470, 929-932 MHz.
  • Image Rejection better than 55 dB.
  • Spurious Rejection better than 55 dB.
  • Channel Spacing 12.5 or 25 kHz.
  • Power 5VDC.
  • Receiving Sensitivity 5µV at 1200 bps.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com

Wireless Network Planners

Wireless Network Planners
Wireless Specialists

R.H. (Ron) Mercer
Consultant
217 First Street
East Northport, NY 11731

ron mercer
Telephone: 631-786-9359
www.wirelessplanners.com left arrow
wirelessplannerron@gmail.com left arrow

blue line

Consulting Alliance

Brad Dye, Ron Mercer, Allan Angus, Vic Jackson, and Ira Wiesenfeld are friends and colleagues who work both together and independently, on wireline and wireless communications projects.

Click here left arrow for a summary of their qualifications and experience. Each one has unique abilities. We would be happy to help you with a project, and maybe save you some time and money.

Note: We do not like Patent Trolls, i.e. “a person or company who enforces patent rights against accused infringers in an attempt to collect licensing fees, but does not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question.” We have helped some prominent law firms defend their clients against this annoyance, and would be happy to do some more of this same kind of work.

Some people use the title “consultant” when they don't have a real job. We actually do consulting work, and help others based on our many years of experience.

“If you would know the road ahead, ask someone who has traveled it.”
— Chinese Proverb

Consulting Alliance

Remote AB Switches

ABX-1 switches are often used at remote transmitter sites to convert from old, outdated and unsupported controllers to the new modern Prism-IPX ipBSC base station controllers. Remotely switch to new controllers with GUI commands.

ABX-1

ABX-3 switches are widely used for enabling or disabling remote equipment and switching I/O connections between redundant messaging systems.

ABX-3

Common Features:

  • RJ45 for A, B and Common connectors.
  • Manual push button or use Prism IP commands to switch one or more relays.
  • Single or Dual Port Control card for IP or Serial connection.
  • Form C relay—control local connection.
  • Power Loss Indicator.
  • Rear Panel Connector for controlling the switch externally.
  • Power Source: 5VDC for ABX-1; 12VDC for ABX-3.

Prism-IPX Systems LLC.

11175 Cicero Dr., Alpharetta, GA 30022
Ph: 678-242-5290 e-mail: sales@prism-ipx.com
prism-ipx.com

blue line

Leavitt Communications

blue line

We can supply alphanumeric display, numeric display, and voice pagers.

We also offer NEW and refurbished Alphamate 250s, refurbished Alphamate IIs, the original Alphamate refurbished, and new and refurbished pagers, pager repairs, pager parts, and accessories. We are FULL SERVICE in Paging! Outstanding service is our goal.

E-mail Phil Leavitt ( pcleavitt@leavittcom.com ) for pricing and delivery information, or for a list of other available paging and two-way related equipment.

Phil Leavitt
847-955-0511
pcleavitt@leavittcom.com

LEAVITT COMMUNICATIONS
7508 N. Red Ledge Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
www.leavittcom.com

blue line

Friday, April 5, 2019

Volume 7 | Issue 67 


5G Takes Center Stage at Wireless Connect

By Leslie Stimson, Inside Towers Washington Bureau Chief


5G panel includes (l-to-r) Jennifer Fritzche, Wells Fargo, Lakshmin Thiagarajan, SOLiD, Douglas Dimitroff, Philips Lytle and David Young, Verizon. Tracy Ford. WIA, was the moderator. Photo by Leslie Stimson, Inside Towers.

While 5G is getting a lot of hype, it’s a long-term play, according to wireless industry experts speaking Thursday at Wireless Connect 2019. Wells Fargo Analyst Jennifer Fritzsche said at the event held at the University of Maryland in College Park, the heart of the issue is whether people will pay more to get 5G connectivity.

“To ask the consumer to pay more, I think, is a hard ask right now,” she said. Unlike previous generations where the connectivity speed drove the use case, 5G has “flipped the script,” she said, adding there’s so many projects in development that will become apparent later.

David Young of Verizon agreed, saying uses like Uber weren’t “obvious” when 4G was deployed. Verizon launched 5G in two cities this week, Inside Towers reported. He does believe it’s important “not to overhype” the technology. “Last year we launched our 5G to the home, which competes with cable modems and DSL services. This will be a multi-year build-out,” he said.

Vertical Bridge CEO and Co-Founder Alex Gellman told Inside Towers he also believes 5G is going to be a longer-term play, perhaps 10 years or so as carriers complete a build-out, see how that goes, and then plan the next deployments.

Some 300 attendees registered for the event, according to organizers. The show is an effort to connect various stakeholders of wireless eco-systems: Operators, Service Providers, Infrastructure Providers, OEMs, Policy Makers, and City Planners.

WIA President/CEO Jonathan Adelstein called 5G “a good news story.” He cited support from the FCC, Congress and the White House. 5G means the creation of 850,000 jobs, he said, citing data from Accenture. “We’re going to need a lot more workers to get this done,” he said, citing WIA efforts like WIA’s Telecommunications Education Center and TIRAP.

The WIA executive gave FCC Commissioner O’Rielly kudos for keeping things moving at the federal level, citing small cell reforms and the agency’s efforts to free up more spectrum for wireless use.

FCC Commissioner O’Rielly gave attendees an update on where various spectrum auctions stand at the Commission. He said the agency “must keep up with market realities. My past efforts to get more spectrum into the marketplace are starting to come to fruition.” O’Rielly noted the FCC recently completed the 28 GHz auction and has a 24GHz auction underway, with more bands “still waiting to be teed up.”

“Most of my attention has been on mid-bands,” O’Rielly said. The CBRS band is likely to be the first mid-band spectrum available for 5G, however, “I’ve been informed it may take until next year” for PAL licenses to be auctioned. The 3.5 GHz CBRS spectrum, “should be available shortly,” he said. Progress has been made in testing the spectrum sharing technology for the CBRS band, “including testing with Navy incumbents,” said O’Rielly. (We will be releasing Inside Towers Tower Talks podcasts from the event featuring interviews with Jonathan Adelstein, Alex Gellman and Jennifer Fritzsche.)

Source: Inside Towers newsletter Courtesy of the editor of Inside Towers.

blue line

BloostonLaw Newsletter

blue line

Selected portions [sometimes more — sometimes less] of the BloostonLaw Telecom Update and/or the BloostonLaw Private Users Update — newsletters from the Law Offices of Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast, LLP — are reproduced in this section of The Wireless Messaging News with kind permission from the firm. The firm's contact information is included at the end of this section of the newsletter.


 BloostonLaw Telecom Update Vol. 22, No. 15 April 3, 2019 

BloostonLaw In the News

At the end of last year, NETCOM, an association for network and communications studies in France, published an article co-authored by BloostonLaw partner Ben Dickens “Consequences of Fifth-Generation Mobile Telephony on Tele-Geography.” Along with Dr. Edward Roche and L. Walker Townes, he discusses the policy issues associated with the fact that 5G will represent the first time the physical communications infrastructure will be separated from the logical or “virtual” infrastructure. See below for more information.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Sal Taillefer.

Headlines


BloostonLaw Publishes 5G Article in French Telecom Journal

At the end of last year, NETCOM, an association for network and communications studies in France, published an article co-authored by BloostonLaw partner Ben Dickens “Consequences of Fifth-Generation Mobile Telephony on Tele-Geography.” There, he discusses policy questions arising from the coming 5G transition alongside Dr. Edward Roche and L. Walker Townes:

The “5G” is a new generation of wireless telecommunications technology that promises to revolutionize how the world communicates. Everything from autonomous vehicles, robots conducting delicate surgery, virtual and augmented reality devices, drones, the “Internet of Things” (IoT), and generally all mobile communications will be enabled by a new tranche of bandwidth between 6-Ghz and 300-Ghz, some of it licensed, but much of it not. But 5G is different. For the first time, the physical infrastructure will be separated from the logical or “virtual” infrastructure. Software Defined Networks (SDN) will be set up and torn down, grown and lessened according to demand. Complex network management will be done by Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). But for all of this to work properly, major carriers will need to accept international standards and open up their interfaces to outsiders, even to competitors. This is where the regulatory and legal fight will take place. Unless sufficient attention is paid now to these emerging issues, users dependent on advanced telecommunications in both North American and the European Union will be prevented from enjoying the full range of benefits promised by 5G, and as a consequence innovation will lag behind other regions of the world.

The article goes on to discuss the international reference model for 5G architecture, which defines a software defined network system that sits on top of its physical network infrastructure. This arrangement, the article continues, allows the software to call on services for different paths, technologies, or frequency sets as needed, and as available. In addition, the architecture includes separately defined modules for critical functions such as billing, customer records, network packet prioritization, and selection of available paths. These modules are accessed through a common set of APIs. The authors posit important emerging policy questions: is the degree to which the architecture is opened up to competition: for example, if two paths are available, but are supplied by two different providers, then what rules determine the selection? If the billing module is opened up, then can companies with a competitive advantage in billing graft their services into the architecture? If the architecture is open, then it will allow the emergence of telecommunication providers that own no infrastructure at all, but act as lower-cost virtual providers. The article assumes that those dominant providers coming first to the market with 5G in the United States will restrict the open nature of the reference model for their own advantage, and proposes that this will generate important public policy challenges for regulation of telecommunication services and the survival of healthy competition.

A copy of the complete article is available (in English) upon request.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Sal Taillefer.

FCC Plans Additional Auction of 5G Spectrum Before End of 2019

In its April Open Meeting (scheduled for Friday, April 12th) the FCC will consider a Public Notice seeking comment on procedures for an auction of Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service (UMFUS) licenses in the 37, 39 and 47 GHz bands. Clients who may be interested in acquiring millimeter wave spectrum for high-capacity backhaul or emerging 5G services should strongly consider participation in this licensing opportunity, as well as in comments to ensure the Commission adopts favorable policies for small businesses and rural service providers. The tentative comment cycle for the Auction 103 Procedures item would have comments due May 15 and reply comments due by May 30.

This opportunity, known as Auction 103, comes hot on the heels of the FCC’s auctions for similar millimeter wave spectrum bands such as the 28 GHz Band (Auction 101) which ended in January, and for 24 GHz spectrum (Auction 102) which is underway now. Limited information about Auction 101 and Auction 102 participants has been reported in the industry trade press due to the tight scheduling of the two auctions and the FCC’s “prohibited communications” auction rules that prevent participants from discussing their bids and/or post-auction plans until after the post-auction payment deadline for Auction 102.

Auction 103 would offer 100 megahertz blocks of spectrum licensed by Partial Economic Area (PEA) service area. Clock auction bidding procedures (where bid prices for a particular category of licenses will increase only when demand exceeds supply) would allow bidding on generic blocks in two categories – one for 37 GHz and 39 GHz and one for 47 GHz – in each PEA in successive clock bidding rounds. The clock phase would also determine the amount of incentive payments due to incumbent 39 GHz licensees that opt to relinquish their spectrum usage rights to promote the reconfiguration of the 39 GHz band.

The FCC’s draft incentive auction proposal would have an aggregate net revenue requirement, whereby the auction would advance to the assignment phase only if at the end of the clock phase, auction proceeds, net of bidding credits, are sufficient to cover incentive payment obligations. The assignment phase would allow bidding for frequency-specific license assignments, while ensuring that all winning bidders will have contiguous block assignments.

Consistent with the Commission’s statutory obligation to promote opportunities for Designated Entities (or “DEs”), the current Auction 103 proposal would include bidding credits of up to $25 million for eligible small businesses and up to $10 million for rural service providers or rural consortia. Combined with the Commission’s recently-adopted policy of substantially reducing upfront payments as well as minimum opening bids for rural markets, it is possible that our clients will be able to secure licenses for their area(s) of interest for a relatively affordable price.

The FCC has not yet set a firm schedule for the 5G Incentive Auction, but consistent with the FCC’s priority of making the maximum amount of 5G spectrum available for auction as quickly as possible, this item looks to be on a fast track. If the Commission is able to review comments and finalize auction procedures by early July, short-form applications for Auction 103 could be due as early as this August. We therefore urge clients who may wish to bid to speak with vendors regarding 5G millimeter wave equipment and services that may be suitable for rural areas and to begin developing a budget and business plans now. And we urge such clients to contact us now to discuss the most appropriate applicant structure for their purposes.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Cary Mitchell

FCC to Look at Partitioning, Disaggregation and Spectrum Leasing

As part of the Congressional mandate under the Making Opportunities for Broadband Investment and Limiting Excessive and Needless Obstacles to Wireless Act (MOBILE NOW Act), the FCC has opened a rule making proceeding to consider reforming the rules governing the partitioning or disaggregation of spectrum licenses and spectrum leasing, to increase availability of advanced telecommunications services in rural areas and spectrum access by small carriers. Comments in this proceeding will be due June 3, 2019 and Reply Comments will be due July 1, 2019.

Specifically, the MOBILE NOW Act requires the FCC to commence a rule making proceeding in order to “assess whether to establish a program, or modify existing programs, under which a licensee that receives a license for exclusive use of spectrum in a specific geographic area . . . may partition or disaggregate the license by sale or long-term lease” in order to make unused spectrum available to either

  1. an unaffiliated “covered small carrier” (a facilities-based carrier with fewer than 1,500 employees) or
  2. an unaffiliated carrier planning to serve a rural area (which is defined in the MOBILE NOW Act as “any area other than
  1. a city, town or incorporated area that has a population of more than 20,000 inhabitants or
  2. an urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to a city or town that has a population of more than 50,000 inhabitants).”

First, the FCC seeks comment on whether reduced performance requirements for partitioned or disaggregated licenses would facilitate the deployment of advanced telecommunications in rural areas. Aspects of this issue include potential modifications to its current requirements that could increase service to rural areas while ensuring that reduced performance requirements do not lead to reduced service in rural America. The FCC is also asking whether adjustments may be appropriate in the context of performance requirements to partitioned or disaggregated licenses that would reduce build-out requirements or temporarily extend construction deadlines.

Second, the FCC asks for comment on whether it should expand its consideration to other classes of licensees, such as those that provide service on a non-common carrier basis or use spectrum for internal use if “it would promote the availability of advanced telecommunications services in rural areas.” In this regard, we note that licenses have been assigned by common carriers to non-common carriers and private firms so that spectrum could be used to meet private internal communications needs. Other issues include conditions that may need to be placed on transfers and assignments of spectrum in order to allow covered small carriers a reasonable build-out period following license grant.

Third, the FCC asks whether it should consider relaxing its spectrum leasing rules in order to facilitate spectrum leases and sales – especially administrative burdens such as obtaining FCC consent, allowing license term extensions or modified performance requirements. In particular, the FCC is asking whether or not its prior consent rules deter transactions and if so, does it have a disproportionate effect on transactions with covered small carriers or unaffiliated carriers that seek to provide service to rural areas. The FCC has asked whether it should allow re-aggregation of license areas (or putting Humpty Dumpty back together again) — especially where a single licensee would hold all the pieces. While not in the FCC’s rules, it is a question that has come up time and again over the years because it would generally make meeting build-out requirements (and renewal requirements) much simpler for the licensee. While re-aggregation of a license would seem to place the license back in the same position that it was before it was broken up by partition or disaggregation, the FCC seems concerned that there could be a reduction in service obligation throughout the service area covered by the licensee, because it would be a single license rather than multiple licenses – each with their own service/performance obligation. As a result, the FCC is also asking whether other conditions should be imposed to ensure that construction requirements for all areas of a re-aggregated license are met before re-aggregation is permitted.

The ultimate question becomes whether these changes will benefit or hinder rural carriers. While relaxation of the FCC’s rules, such as additional time to meet construction requirements would be beneficial, to the extent that these changes would impose higher expectations on rural carriers it could be a double edged sword. Additionally, it is important to note that the definition for rural area under Section 616 of the MOBILITY NOW Act differs significantly from the traditional definition of rural area that the FCC has used — namely population density of 100 or less per square mile in any county. This change could mean that larger counties (land-wise) with low population densities may not qualify for treatment as “rural” if the population thresholds are exceeded.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast, Cary Mitchell, and Richard Rubino.

Comments on 900 MHz Band Broadband Reconfiguration Due May 3

On April 3, the FCC published in the Federal Register its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on facilitating broadband deployment in the 896-901/935-940 MHz band (900 MHz band) currently configured for narrowband operations. Comments are due on May 3 and reply comments are due on June 3.

Specifically, the Commission proposes to realign the band to create a paired 3/3 megahertz broadband segment, licensed on a geographic basis, while reserving two remaining segments for continued narrowband operations. The Commission proposes to authorize a market-driven voluntary exchange process that would allow existing licensees in the band to mutually agree to a plan for clearing of the broadband segment by relocating site-based incumbents to narrowband spectrum. The Commission also seeks comment on two other transition methods — an auction of overlay licenses and an incentive auction, options that might be needed to effectuate 900 MHz band realignment in certain markets.

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Cary Mitchell.

Law & Regulation


West Virginia Enacts 5G Infrastructure Reform Laws

According to an FCC Press Release dated March 29, West Virginia’s Governor Jim Justice and its legislature recently enacted a cell reform bill that limits government fees and speeds review periods for the build out of small cells, paving the way for 5G. Specifically, West Virginia’s small cell reform bill allows localities to charge up to $25 per year for the use of the right-of-way and $65 per year for attachment of small cells to certain utility poles, and it requires localities to approve or disapprove of small cell attachments generally within 60 days of applications.

In a statement, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said:

“West Virginia’s leaders recognize the opportunity that 5G will create for its economy, education, and healthcare,” said Commissioner Carr. “By setting limits on government fees and review periods, they will speed next-gen broadband deployment throughout the Mountain State. I applaud Governor Snyder and the state legislature on its forward-looking leadership. With 22 state small-cell bills enacted and counting, and reforms by the FCC at the federal level, we are already seeing significant results. One provider reports that they turned on 27,000 small cells in 2018 alone—an 800 percent increase from 2017. Another provider now expects to double its small cell deployment from 2018 levels. I look forward to continuing to advance policies that ensure every community benefits from next-gen connectivity.”

BloostonLaw Contacts: John Prendergast and Cary Mitchell.

Congress Introduces Cellphone Jamming Act for Prisons

On March 28, Representatives David Kustoff (TN-08) and William Timmons (SC-04) introduced H.R. 1954-the Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2019, with Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introducing identical legislation on the Senate side, to address the use of contraband cell phones in state and federal correctional facilities. According to press releases from the congressmen, this bill is not a mandate but instead “an option for state and federal prisons to implement a jamming system that will protect inmates and the public at large.” Of concern to wireless service providers and users is whether cell jamming technology used by prisons will block cell calls — including calls to 911 — in neighborhoods near such prisons.

Specifically, the bill:

  • Allows state and federal prisons to use jamming systems to interfere with cellphone signals within the housing facilities of the inmates.
  • Requires the state or federal facility that implements a jamming system to report such use to the Bureau of Prisons, which will have the ultimate authority over the system.
  • Allows for the facilities to choose from a broad category of jamming technology, which includes managed access technology, surgical jamming technology, beacon technology, or any future technology that would curb the use of contraband cellphones, and does not prescribe the specific types of technology that must be used by the facilities.

“Contraband cell phones have been a major problem in correctional facilities nationwide, and it is long past due that Congress take action and protect the public from criminals who continue their illegal activities from behind bars. Inmates use these cellphones to engage in drug operations, sex trafficking, and organizing escapes that cause devastating consequences for public safety and empower these criminals to continue a life of crime,” said Rep. David Kustoff. “I am happy to join my colleagues in introducing this vital piece of legislation, and I look forward to its swift passage.

“The Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2019 is a common-sense solution to a very real problem. I am proud to add my support to this bill,” said Rep. William Timmons.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Mary Sisak.

Industry


Congress Introduces Resolution Declaring Chinese Telecommunications Firms Security Risks

On March 28, U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.), Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) introduced a resolution declaring, “Chinese telecommunications companies such as Huawei and ZTE pose serious threats to the national security of the United States and allies of the United States.”

According to the press release, “Allowing Huawei equipment to be installed in the United States or our allied nations would introduce serious risks in our communication systems. This bipartisan Resolution will complement the Administration’s efforts and show that the United States Congress has serious concerns about using certain Chinese telecommunications equipment in global 5G infrastructure.”

“Our allies and partners should understand the risk Chinese telecommunications companies like Huawei and ZTE pose to their networks and our ability to communicate with each other in a secure manner,” said Senator Coons. “I urge the administration to continue its work with our allies so they are fully able to protect the 5G networks of the future.”

“Huawei and ZTE telecommunications products are not safe for the U.S. or any of our allies around the globe,” said Senator Gardner. “Our intelligence community has made it abundantly clear Huawei and ZTE put the security of our communications at risk and it is concerning that allies like Germany are considering relying on their products. Now Congress is moving in a bipartisan fashion to emphasize what this Administration, previous Administrations, and many of our allies have said about the risks of Huawei and ZTE. It is my hope all of our allies in Europe and around the globe hear us loud and clear.”

“In today’s increasingly connected world, we must work with our allies and partners to animate technology with our values, especially in 5G networks,” said Senator Markey. “Chinese law requires its companies, including Huawei and ZTE, to fully cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party. If we don’t address emerging threats collectively, we stand to jeopardize our national security, the rules of the road, and the very underpinnings of the international system.”

Securus and ICS Call Off Merger

On April 2, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced that inmate calling services providers Securus Technologies Inc. and Inmate Calling Solutions, LLC have withdrawn their merger application after Commission staff recommended to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai that the Commission deny the transaction. Chairman Ajit Pai today issued the following statement:

“Based on a record of nearly 1 million documents comprised of 7.7 million pages of information submitted by the applicants, as well as arguments and evidence submitted by criminal justice advocates, consumer groups, and other commenters, FCC staff concluded that this deal posed significant competitive concerns and would not be in the public interest. I agree. I’m therefore pleased that the companies have determined that withdrawing their application is the best course.”

Deadlines


MAY 1: FCC FORM 499-Q, TELECOMMUNICATIONS REPORTING WORKSHEET. All telecommunications common carriers that expect to contribute more than $10,000 to federal Universal Service Fund (USF) support mechanisms must file this quarterly form. The FCC has modified this form in light of its recent decision to establish interim measures for USF contribution assessments. The form contains revenue information from the prior quarter plus projections for the next quarter. Form 499-Q relates only to USF contributions. It does not relate to the cost recovery mechanisms for the Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Fund, the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA), and the shared costs of local number portability (LNP), which are covered in the annual form (Form 499-A) that was due April 1.

BloostonLaw Contacts: Ben Dickens and Gerry Duffy.

MAY 31: FCC FORM 395, EMPLOYMENT REPORT. Common carriers, including wireless carriers, with 16 or more full-time employees must file their annual Common Carrier Employment Reports (FCC Form 395) by May 31. This report tracks carrier compliance with rules requiring recruitment of minority employees. Further, the FCC requires all common carriers to report any employment discrimination complaints they received during the past year. That information is also due on May 31. The FCC encourages carriers to complete the discrimination report requirement by filling out Section V of Form 395, rather than submitting a separate report.

BloostonLaw Contact: Richard Rubino.

Calendar At-a-Glance


April
Apr. 3 – Comments are due on Truth in Caller ID Rules.
Apr. 8 – Reply comments are due on USF Overlap Auction NPRM.
Apr. 15 – Comments are due on IP CTS Management Rules.
Apr. 16 – Reply comments are due on Satellite Services Rules NPRM.
Apr. 22 – Reply comments are due on DBS Satellite System Licensing NPRM.
Apr. 29 – Comments are due on Broadcast Ownership Rules.
Apr. 29 – Reply comments are due on IP CTS Management Rules.

May
May 1 – FCC Form 499-Q (Quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet) is due.
May 3 – Reply comments on Truth in Caller ID Rules are due.
May 3 – Comments are due on 900 MHz Broadband Reconfiguration NPRM.
May 15 – Comments are due on Auction 103 Procedures.
May 29 – Reply comments on Broadcast Ownership Rules are due.
May 30 – Reply comments are due on Auction 103 Procedures.
May 31 – FCC Form 395 (Annual Employment Report) is due.

June
Jun. 1 – Deadline to file AM/FM License Renewals – DC, MD, VA, WV.
Jun. 3 – Comments are due on MOBILE NOW Act Implementation NPRM.
Jun. 3 – Comments are due on 900 MHz Broadband Reconfiguration NPRM.

July Jul. 3 – Reply comments are due on MOBILE NOW Act Implementation NPRM.

LAW OFFICES OF
BLOOSTON, MORDKOFSKY, DICKENS,
DUFFY & PRENDERGAST, LLP

2120 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 659-0830
(202) 828-5568 (fax)

— CONTACTS —

Harold Mordkofsky, 202-828-5520, hma@bloostonlaw.com
Benjamin H. Dickens, Jr., 202-828-5510, bhd@bloostonlaw.com
Gerard J. Duffy, 202-828-5528, gjd@bloostonlaw.com
John A. Prendergast, 202-828-5540, jap@bloostonlaw.com
Richard D. Rubino, 202-828-5519, rdr@bloostonlaw.com
Mary J. Sisak, 202-828-5554, mjs@bloostonlaw.com
D. Cary Mitchell, 202-828-5538, cary@bloostonlaw.com
Salvatore Taillefer, Jr., 202-828-5562, sta@bloostonlaw.com

This newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice. Those interested in more information should contact the firm.

blue line

Complete Technical Services for the Communications and Electronics Industries


Technical Services Inc.

Texas Registered Engineering Firm #F16945

“It's more than Push-To-Talk”

7711 Scotia Drive
Dallas, TX 75248-3112

Ira Wiesenfeld, P.E.

President • Principal Engineer
CETsr CA GROL IEEE LSM
WA5GXP

Cell: 214-707-7711
E-mail: iwiesenfel@aol.com
Toll Free: 844-IWA-TECH (844-492-8324)

Design  •  Installation  •  Maintenance  •  Training

blue line

Current member or former member of these organizations.


Best regards,
brad's signature
Newsletter Editor
73 DE K9IQY
Licensed since 1957
Institute Electrical and
ieee
Electronics Engineers

MENSA MEMBER
mensa member
If you are curious about why I joined Mensa, click here.

A Public Library of
animated gif
Paging and Wireless Messaging
Information
Wireless
wireless logo medium
Messaging

Brad Dye
P.O. Box 266
Fairfield, IL 62837 USA

Critical Messaging
cmma
Association
European Mobile Messaging Association
emma logo
Former Board Member
ZP5TQ

Radio Club of Paraguay
Quarter Century
qcwa
Wireless Association
Back To Paging
pagerman
Still The Most Reliable
Wireless Protocol
For Emergencies!
American Association

of Woodturners
U.S. Navy

Radioman
U.S. Navy
Radioman

radioman second class
Second Class
Petty Officer
Boy Scouts of America

National Honor Society
Creator of The

Paging Wheel of Fortune
National Skeet

Shooting Association
The National

Rifle Association
American
Radio

arrl
Relay
League
The Radio Club
of America
Life is good!

I am a person in long-term recovery.

CONTACT INFO & LINKS

Skype: braddye
Twitter: @BradDye1
Telephone: +1-618-599-7869
E–mail: brad@braddye.com
Wireless: Consulting page
Paging: Home Page
Marketing & Engineering Papers
K9IQY: Ham Radio Page

Amateur Radio
K9IQY

  • ex KN9IQY, KN4BK, KM5NK, WB4JCF, ZP5TQ, WA4VXU, WA9RVL, /TI2, /9Y4, /6Y5, /KP4, HH2FJ
  • Licensed FCC Amateur Radio operator since 1957
  • Licensed FCC First-Class-Commercial Operator/Engineer since 1964
VETERAN

United States Navy

The above is just like the old men who have stickers on the rear window of their pickup trucks.

blue line

THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK

blue line

“Where words fail, music speaks.”

― Hans Christian Andersen

blue line

MUSICAL SELECTION OF THE WEEK

blue line

“Minor Rag”
Spanish Rag Medley

Playing For Change
Published on Apr 5, 2019

We are happy to release this Live Outside video of Spanish songwriter and guitarist Twanguero performing his original medley, "Minor Rag - Spanish Rag," from his album Carreteras Secundarias.

Source: YouTube  

blue line

blue line

Home Page Directory Consulting Newsletters Free Subscription Products Reference Glossary Send e-mail